Login
or
Register
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Home
»
Model Railroader
»
Forums
»
Layouts and layout building
»
Coffee table layout & multi-level track
Coffee table layout & multi-level track
4349 views
2 replies
Order Ascending
Order Descending
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Thursday, August 14, 2003 9:18 AM
I'm thinking of making a coffee table with a N scale with a glass top but haven't told the other half yet but will talk to her about it when i have orgnised a good case lol.
She is not that bad she encrouges me (not that i need it!) :B
Reply
Edit
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Thursday, August 14, 2003 9:18 AM
I'm thinking of making a coffee table with a N scale with a glass top but haven't told the other half yet but will talk to her about it when i have orgnised a good case lol.
She is not that bad she encrouges me (not that i need it!) :B
Reply
Edit
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Tuesday, August 12, 2003 11:58 AM
Multiple levels and extra mainline run is well worth the slight extra complexity in construction. Just try to allow cleaning access for your crossover spots. Keep grades 3% or less with vertical easements (especially at the bottoms) so body ,oumted coupler trip pins don't hang up on turnout parts or outer rails on graded curves. Also, if using styrofoam for an upper level\ yard, place a thin flat piece of plywood under the turnout ladder to keep them all flat - styrofoam can have small thickness variations that cause leading pilots to mis-track turnout points.
Reply
Edit
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Tuesday, August 12, 2003 11:58 AM
Multiple levels and extra mainline run is well worth the slight extra complexity in construction. Just try to allow cleaning access for your crossover spots. Keep grades 3% or less with vertical easements (especially at the bottoms) so body ,oumted coupler trip pins don't hang up on turnout parts or outer rails on graded curves. Also, if using styrofoam for an upper level\ yard, place a thin flat piece of plywood under the turnout ladder to keep them all flat - styrofoam can have small thickness variations that cause leading pilots to mis-track turnout points.
Reply
Edit
dustyg
Member since
January 2001
From: US
23 posts
Coffee table layout & multi-level track
Posted by
dustyg
on Tuesday, August 12, 2003 10:23 AM
I model in N scale. At present, the only space I have for a layout will be in a coffee table that a furniture-making friend is building for me. The internal dimensions are roughly 27 1/2 inches wide by 48 inches long, by about 6 inches high.
I'm currently drawing the track plan, and am trying to decide between keeping the track on one level, and letting the scenery rise and fall around it, or doing some kind of folded dogbone arrangement and having the track cross over itself - a similar arrangement was featured in the Sept., 2001, MR.
I'd like to hear opinions about the aggravation and complexity of multiple levels, but gaining twice as much mainline distance, versus keeping a simpler but shorter, one-level track plan.
I will cross-post this to the main forum. I'd love to hear from you on a forum, or e-mail me directly with your thoughts (dgpreacher@yahoo.com). Thanks!
Dusty Garison
Reply
dustyg
Member since
January 2001
From: US
23 posts
Coffee table layout & multi-level track
Posted by
dustyg
on Tuesday, August 12, 2003 10:23 AM
I model in N scale. At present, the only space I have for a layout will be in a coffee table that a furniture-making friend is building for me. The internal dimensions are roughly 27 1/2 inches wide by 48 inches long, by about 6 inches high.
I'm currently drawing the track plan, and am trying to decide between keeping the track on one level, and letting the scenery rise and fall around it, or doing some kind of folded dogbone arrangement and having the track cross over itself - a similar arrangement was featured in the Sept., 2001, MR.
I'd like to hear opinions about the aggravation and complexity of multiple levels, but gaining twice as much mainline distance, versus keeping a simpler but shorter, one-level track plan.
I will cross-post this to the main forum. I'd love to hear from you on a forum, or e-mail me directly with your thoughts (dgpreacher@yahoo.com). Thanks!
Dusty Garison
Reply
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Users Online
There are no community member online
Search the Community
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter
See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter
and get model railroad news in your inbox!
Sign up