'Cleaning Up' Peco PL10 switch controllers?Has anyone had the occassion to need to 'clean up' older, used controllers? I got a whole box of them recently that probably came off someones layout, and then set around for quite awhile. Some work perfectly smooth, and others are the slightest bit stiff. Could they be soaked in something, then left to dry out totally before use.?,....somthing like that CRC electronic cleaner??
Brian
My Layout Plan
Interesting new Plan Consideration
P.S.
If you think this is bad, wait until you see what it cost to install working signals!!!
It is assuming you already have the turnout and the turnout motor, or you would not need it to start with. The Snap-it, at about 18-20 bucks is something that works, and it's still only about 5-10 % the cost of a good DCC/Sound Locomotive. That's what you pay for automation. Just don't buy 10 at once. Spread it out over some time and you won't even see it. You can also buy the Snap-it Quad for about 55-60 bucks. Better than 80.
Anything that is '1 per turnout' is going to be relatively espensive - the firware in the device and most of the hardware is capable of operating a lot more than one, so units that can operate multiple solenoids are significantly cheaper on a per turnout basis. EG, Digitrax DS64, it's $48 and runs 4, so $12 each instead of $20. And it still has the local buttons.
--Randy
Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's
Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.
B. Bryce I use all Peco turnouts on my layout and have never had a single problem. I use some PL13 switches with the PL10 solonoids and have not had problems with them as of yet either. One thing I will say is, all of my Peco solonioids are powered from NCE's Snap-it switch motor controllers, which come equipped with CD units. If the onboard CD is not enough, you can patch in a larger one, but I have never had to do this. The turnout snaps quickly, firmly and positively every time. I power the Snap-It card from the rails so I have DCC control of the turnout from my NCE Powercab, I have installed local push button control switches to operate the turnout locally, which simply operates the Snap-It board via the push buttons instead of the Powercab. I can also operate the turnouts manually if I desire. Completely happy with this setup. The cards are not expensive and if you buy one or two every week or so, you will not even notice it.
I use all Peco turnouts on my layout and have never had a single problem. I use some PL13 switches with the PL10 solonoids and have not had problems with them as of yet either. One thing I will say is, all of my Peco solonioids are powered from NCE's Snap-it switch motor controllers, which come equipped with CD units. If the onboard CD is not enough, you can patch in a larger one, but I have never had to do this. The turnout snaps quickly, firmly and positively every time. I power the Snap-It card from the rails so I have DCC control of the turnout from my NCE Powercab, I have installed local push button control switches to operate the turnout locally, which simply operates the Snap-It board via the push buttons instead of the Powercab. I can also operate the turnouts manually if I desire. Completely happy with this setup. The cards are not expensive and if you buy one or two every week or so, you will not even notice it.
These Snap-it units cost about $20 each?https://www.modeltrainstuff.com/nce-524115-snap-it-accessory-switch-machine-decoder/
Add that to the price of the solonoid and the turnout itself, and you are talking an expensive package per turnout.
Some years ago our club put in a Peco three way turn out. I fired it with a CDU.
Works fine.
Rich
If you ever fall over in public, pick yourself up and say “sorry it’s been a while since I inhabited a body.” And just walk away.
As compensation, the Code 83 ones have cutouts in the ties underneath where the jumpers are and where the alternate jumpers/feeders get soldered to the rail, so they are easy to modify as shown on Wiring for DCC without melting ties or having to attempt cutting into the structure of the turnout.
I have no doubt these turnouts will be as solid as any others I've used. And with Peco coming out with a Code 70 North American style track, it will be even better, easy to make sidings using a lower profile rail.
Bria, the tab is not that great. Good new but if they ever get bumped say during cleaning, they are very difficult to get back into the correct place. Too high and it lifts the point rail, too low and it doesn't help.
Don't stress over Peco. They are the go too track system in the UK, Australia, New Zealand etc. My own layout pre-dates Peco code 83 so I used Walthers Shinohara but I will be using Peco for the rebuild I have just started.
Bill
rrinker Got one right here in my hands. There is no tab for contact on the moveable points, it's just contact between the point and the stock rail. --Randy
Got one right here in my hands. There is no tab for contact on the moveable points, it's just contact between the point and the stock rail.
Interesting, that might make utilizing them in their 'stock form' more questionable from a wiring standpoint.
I might be wrong here, but I don't think code 83 has that additional tab?Bill
I don't utilize this code track, but I would be interested to know the answer to this?
railandsail I've seen this mentioned several times on various forums, BUT I have yet to find a single person who has actually experienced it in person. And if it did occur over a long time, perhaps the traffic would experience a little bit more of a bump than they now experience with the deeper flangeways in some turnouts.
I'll pm you the name of someone.
Rio Grande. The Action Road - Focus 1977-1983
riogrande5761 He who should not be mentioned here reports another reason for Electrofrog is that because the frog is metal, it stands up to wear over time, whereas the plastic frog can eventually wear down under a lot of prolonged traffic.
He who should not be mentioned here reports another reason for Electrofrog is that because the frog is metal, it stands up to wear over time, whereas the plastic frog can eventually wear down under a lot of prolonged traffic.
bagal I wouldn't see much point in using Electrofog unless the frog is to be powered. Bill
I wouldn't see much point in using Electrofog unless the frog is to be powered.
railandsail This is an extremely realiable power contact,...correct?...particularly when combined with that additional metal tab contact they provide in their design.
This is an extremely realiable power contact,...correct?...particularly when combined with that additional metal tab contact they provide in their design.
If I'd use Peco PL-10 switch machines I'd calculate. Otherwise I might end up with a CDU with not enough power.
While working with German track material I never needed or used CDUs. But most of the German solenoid turnout units contain limit switches. After I switched to American prototypes I didn't think about this kind of switch motor again. Regards, Volker
VOLKER LANDWEHRHere are the Peco turnout "motor" current draws that might help to decide if a capacitor discharge unit is needed.
Don't bother with calculations. Just get a capacitive discharge unit and use it for any and all twin-coil machines on your layout. You won't have to worry about voltage loss from long wire runs, or trying to run two or more machines at the same time. More important, perhaps, is that you will be protected from burning out switch machines thanks to sticking control panel toggles. The CD circuit guards against that.
If you use twin-coil machines, you should have a CD circuit. You only need one of them for all the machines on a typical layout.
It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse.
railandsailThis is an extremely realiable power contact,...correct?...particularly when combined with that additional metal tab contact they provide in their design.
I've never had a problem with either physical or electrical contact from a Peco turnout. I like them because of the solid physical contact. Locos and rolling stock do not "pick the points" and derail when approaching from the point ends, as sometimes happens with Atlas turnouts, particularly on the diverging routes.
Here are the Peco turnout "motor" current draws that might help to decide if a capacitor discharge unit is needed.
- PL-10 (black insulation): 2.0 - 2.4 A- PL-10W (green insulation): 1.0 - 1.4 ARegards, Volker
MisterBeasleyOn the other hand, the Peco spring is what distinguishes it from the rest, holding the points against the stock rails, and allowing manual operation either with or without a switch machine installed.
Peco point rail contact realiability
Texas ZepherThe operative word there is "need". No, the points themselves will properly route the power. Pecos have a built in spring that holds the point rail against the outside rail. In 20 years I have not had one of those fail on their own. I've had bits of ballast get between the points and the rail but that causes a derailment anyway.... Many people choose to add an addional wire to provide power directly to the frog. This makes the electrical conductivity through the turnout more bullet proof. In my opinion this is more important with other brands than it is with PECO.
In that same 20 years have you had any problems with the realiabilty of the stock manner that Pecos have with their point rail contacts??
BLI E8's Electrical Pickup Problems?
Do BLI E8's really have pickup problems with their multiple wheel configurations??
fallNflag The PL-13 switch you show is not as useful as the PL-15 switch which is a dual switch. It can be used to power the frog, but can also send power to a signal if you like. It could power the LED on your switch panel if you chose to have one. Another option is buy the PL10E with the extended pin. Then you can buy an optional PL-9 mounting plate that allows the switch motor to mount to the table, and only the extended pin goes through the table to the switch above. You won't have to cut a large piece out of the layout to mount the switch that would have a motor mounted directly under it. The Capacitor Dischagre Unit (CDU) is needed in most situations for these switches. One will usually be enough for a layout, unless it is large one. There is a PL-10W which is a normal PL-10 but with a more efficient motor. It usually means you won't need the CDU on the layout. There is also the PL-10WL which is both more efficient and has the extended pin. When I bought my switches, they were used and came with PL10 motors. They did not have the extended pin and were not the efficient version. I got them cheap enough that I make the concession. I bought the CDU, but I will have to cut into my layout to get the switches mounted to the layout. That makes it a little harder to lay track, and it means that ballasting will be harder as mentioned above. If you buy new, and you have the choice, I would have PL10-WE motors on every switch, and buy the PL-9 mounting plates to mount the motors to the under side of the layout. I did buy the PL-15 switches after reading too many posts from people with the PL-13s and issues that are corrected with the PL-15. I intend to have it power the frogs (won't rely on the rails being held by the spring as the only method of routing the power.) I am also going to have it power signals at each switch for the engineers. Yes, they are complicated compared to using the insulfrogs. They also allow a GE44 ton to creep through the turnout and never stall, as well as helping my BLI E8s cruise through and not die. They are tempermental engines due to the sound decoders, but the Peco's greatly improve the problem. Good luck with the purchase. They are indeed worth the trouble. Stuart
The PL-13 switch you show is not as useful as the PL-15 switch which is a dual switch. It can be used to power the frog, but can also send power to a signal if you like. It could power the LED on your switch panel if you chose to have one. Another option is buy the PL10E with the extended pin. Then you can buy an optional PL-9 mounting plate that allows the switch motor to mount to the table, and only the extended pin goes through the table to the switch above. You won't have to cut a large piece out of the layout to mount the switch that would have a motor mounted directly under it. The Capacitor Dischagre Unit (CDU) is needed in most situations for these switches. One will usually be enough for a layout, unless it is large one. There is a PL-10W which is a normal PL-10 but with a more efficient motor. It usually means you won't need the CDU on the layout. There is also the PL-10WL which is both more efficient and has the extended pin.
When I bought my switches, they were used and came with PL10 motors. They did not have the extended pin and were not the efficient version. I got them cheap enough that I make the concession. I bought the CDU, but I will have to cut into my layout to get the switches mounted to the layout. That makes it a little harder to lay track, and it means that ballasting will be harder as mentioned above. If you buy new, and you have the choice, I would have PL10-WE motors on every switch, and buy the PL-9 mounting plates to mount the motors to the under side of the layout.
I did buy the PL-15 switches after reading too many posts from people with the PL-13s and issues that are corrected with the PL-15. I intend to have it power the frogs (won't rely on the rails being held by the spring as the only method of routing the power.) I am also going to have it power signals at each switch for the engineers.
Yes, they are complicated compared to using the insulfrogs. They also allow a GE44 ton to creep through the turnout and never stall, as well as helping my BLI E8s cruise through and not die. They are tempermental engines due to the sound decoders, but the Peco's greatly improve the problem. Good luck with the purchase. They are indeed worth the trouble.
Stuart
If you are considering using Servo motors, Peco recently announced a set of 4 servos and controller board that will work with un-modified turnouts: http://www.peco-uk.com/page.asp?id=Switch2014
Co-owner of the proposed CT River Valley RR (HO scale) http://home.comcast.net/~docinct/CTRiverValleyRR/
Thanks everyone. The info here is some of the most helpful I've found.
Hominamad,
You should find this useful, should the need arise:
http://railwaybobsmodulebuildingtips.blogspot.com/2013/01/the-peco-electrofrog-circuitry.html
Frank
hominamad1) Is it correct to say that I can use an electrofrog turnout "out of the box" but that it will only be powered through the rail point?
OR would it cause a short without a few wiring changes?
2) If I don't use something like a frog juicer, does this mean the frogs won't be powered, and then is it effectively the same as an insulfrog?
if I should also buy something like the above piece as well.
Modeling B&O in the early 50's.
"Respectfully disagree. While I usually remove the over center spring from my PECOs with Tortoises, I have left them on in a few places and substituted a thicker acutator wire. In any case, removing the spring is not much of a "modification". Takes a few seconds."
In any case, removing the spring is not much of a "modification". Takes a few seconds."
You're absolutely right, but one of the things most of us like about the Tortoise machine is that "slow motion" traverse of the points from one side to the other, which becomes just another snap-switch if you drive an unmodified Peco with a Tortoise. On the other hand, the Peco spring is what distinguishes it from the rest, holding the points against the stock rails, and allowing manual operation either with or without a switch machine installed.
Also, the spring can't be removed easily once the turnout is installed.