Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
I thought about it. But the PECO Code 55 is really just huge code 80 rail sunk into the ties. The ties are still big, and spaced too far apart. Basically, it's code 80 in sheep's clothing. I used PECO turnouts on my last layout, and they worked well, but I'm really trying to make the track look better than that. I wi***hey made an N-Scale version of their newer HO Code 83 trackage, which really looks like North American track, and has nicer tie spacing. <br /> <br />After fooling around with some Atlas code 55 last night, I realize that it will be a bust trying to <br />shave down the spike heads. And besides that, I'm not too happy with the big ugly plastic frogs they use in their crossings. I'm going to look at some Shinohara code 70 crossings. They are pretty expensive (about $14.00 each!) but they should look much better, and I think I can disguise the code 70 rail well enough in the ballast. I ordered one so I can experiment.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag

Update Reply

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Model Railroader Newsletter See all

Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!