QUOTE: Originally posted by JPM335 I may be wrong, but I seem to remember that with your locobuffer connected to digitrax, you can control your turnouts from the PC. You may need JMRI panelpro, but thats free so no big deal. I think you do have to have stationary decoders for the switch machines though.
QUOTE: Originally posted by ironpenguin You might look at the CTI system: http://www.cti-electronics.com/index.htm Mike Tennent
QUOTE: Originally posted by ereimer QUOTE: Originally posted by ironpenguin You might look at the CTI system: http://www.cti-electronics.com/index.htm Mike Tennent ahh beat me to it !!! CTI isn't cheap either , but i think it beats stationary decoders slightly . you'll probably need the starter set ($99) plus 2 switchmans ($89.95 each) , comes out to about $8.70 per turnout
QUOTE: Originally posted by Stevert Go with stationary decoders and JMRI. Cost-wise it's going to be about the same either way, but since you already have DCC you already have most/all of the needed control wiring in place. Nothing against CTI, but at this point why would you want to wire up another whole control system under the layout? Also, JMRI is oh so much more than just Panel Pro! You already have the LocoBuffer II and the PC, why not download JMRI and explore some of it's functions? http://jmri.sourceforge.net/index.html FWIW, I use PanelPro with DS54's and SRC8's to control about 25 Tortoise switch motors on my layout. HTH, Steve P.S. A quick look at the CTI site shows some real propaganda. They say, "One of the big drawbacks of digital command control is that it has no sensing capability. Thus, automated operation simply isn't possible." But that's flat-out false. There are many, many occupancy detectors available for DCC, not to mention feedback systems like Digitrax's Transponding and the others already on the market or in the works...
QUOTE: Originally posted by Kyle S. Much to my surprise, most of the stationary DCC decoders seem to be priced fairly reasonable in comparison. I expected a much higher "hobby markup". The SRC8's have a nice price tag, but unfortunatly won't work with my twin-coils. Too bad..
QUOTE: Originally posted by Stevert P.S. A quick look at the CTI site shows some real propaganda. They say, "One of the big drawbacks of digital command control is that it has no sensing capability. Thus, automated operation simply isn't possible." But that's flat-out false. There are many, many occupancy detectors available for DCC, not to mention feedback systems like Digitrax's Transponding and the others already on the market or in the works...
QUOTE: Originally posted by bikerraypa what about this hickymajig made by Atlas: http://tinyurl.com/8mfma does it still require a decoder for each turnout? I'm interested in this myself!! Ray
QUOTE: Originally posted by Maltese_Mike if you can read a basic electronic circuit, solder it together and know what "MS-DOS" means, well then, you are in business!!!!...
Chuck
Grand River & Monongah Railroad and subsidiary Monongah Railway
QUOTE: Originally posted by ragarrett01 To correct everyone on CTI's switchman. It will control 16 twin coil switches, So only two are needed to control 32 switches. The answer to how that can be is you will need 64 diodes and 32 capactors. CTI has those also and at very reasonable price. I only have 12 switches and CTI works great.