Login
or
Register
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Home
»
Model Railroader
»
Forums
»
Layouts and layout building
»
Recommendations for *N scale* track and turnouts please!
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
My first N-Scale layout used all Peco code 80 turnouts. In the 1980s, when I started it, they were about the best thing around for reliability. However: <br /> <br />1. They are not precisely in guage. I shimmed the guard rails on them .010" styrene to solve that problem <br />2. Over time, the "power routing" fails because a little bit of dirt or corrosion will keep <br />the point rails from making good contact. <br />3. They are very "chunky" with big ties, big rails, and outrageous tie spacing, at least by <br />today's standards. <br /> <br />In my current layout, begun 2 years ago, I am using all Micro Engineering Code 55. In my opinion, there is nothing better. Solving the DCC problem might be a bit of a pain, (I don't use DCC), but I'd still do it. <br />I also connected a microswitch under the table, linked to the throwbar, on every turnout, to carry <br />the current to the two diverging routes. I am not relying on the point rails to complete the circuit like I did with the Peco turnouts. Nearly all my turnouts are hand-thrown with Caboose Industries ground throws. But I do have a few that are operated by Tortoise machines or Switchcraft machines. On these, I still just mounted a microswitch to route the current. BTW, the Switchcraft are much better, MUCH quieter machines. I was disappointed at how noisy the one Tortoise was, so I won't be using another one. <br /> <br /> <br />I didn't use the Atlas code 55 because of the flange problem. I would convert my rolling stock, and there are replacement wheelsets for some common diesels, but for some of my steam locomotive, many of which are semi-scratchbuilt and remotored, I'd be looking at turning down driver flanges. <br />Besides, the Micro Engineering track does look better. <br /> <br />"Most" of the turnouts are guaged perfectly. But believe it or not, I've had a few, even in the ME, where I had to file the insides of the stock rails and the point rails to "open up" the guage a little, because they were a tad narrow (which can be a real problem with long-wheelbase steam locomotives!) <br /> <br />The only downsides to using ME are that they really only make a #6 turnout (no crossings, no #8, etc), and it is expensive (about $13-$14 per turnout, $4 - $5 per section of flextrack). But if you are patient and built up slowly, it's well worth it, in my opinion. <br />
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Users Online
There are no community member online
Search the Community
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter
See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter
and get model railroad news in your inbox!
Sign up