Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Code 100 vs Code 83

643 views
5 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Ocoee
  • 4 posts
Code 100 vs Code 83
Posted by bgilbert43 on Friday, July 22, 2005 11:52 AM
Greetings,

I currently have a 4x8 layout made of Code 100 sectional track. This current layout is coming down in favor of an around the walls layout.

Are there any issues regarding a switch to Code 83 of which I should be concerned? Do I have to change wheelsets, for instance. Or any other matters relating to such a change.

Thank you for your input.
  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: Wylie, Texas
  • 259 posts
Posted by UNIONPACIFIC4018 on Friday, July 22, 2005 12:07 PM
If you have some old equipment without RP25 wheels and you got the big old flanges they will bump down the ties.
Sean Steam is still king
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Ocoee
  • 4 posts
Posted by bgilbert43 on Friday, July 22, 2005 1:12 PM
All of my equipment has been purchased since 2001. I don't know if that means anything or not...
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: San Diego
  • 954 posts
Posted by stokesda on Friday, July 22, 2005 1:46 PM
If it's that recent, it's probably OK. Still, if you're very concerned, you might want to pick up a single piece of flextrack (or a pack of Atlas sectional track) and try it out first.

Dan Stokes

My other car is a tunnel motor

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Friday, July 22, 2005 2:04 PM
As long as it's stuff like Atlas, Bachmann, Life-Like, Kato, Stewart, Athearn - you won't have any problems. It's the AHM/IHC/Rivarossi and other equipment made with European NEM flanges that have problems on Code 83. And even then - if the problem item is a passenger or freight car, it's easy to replace the wheelsets. If it's a loco with oversize flanges, there's not much you can do. I've heard of people turning down loco drivers by powering the unit and holding a file to the wheel, but I'm at the point where if it has that problem and can't be easily fixed, it gets sold.

--Randy

Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Ocoee
  • 4 posts
Posted by bgilbert43 on Friday, July 22, 2005 2:36 PM
Well, thank you very much fellas. It seems like I'll be okay with a little testing. I am going the full nine yards this time...dcc, flex track, micro engineering turnouts, etc.

Thanks again for your time. I'll keep y'all posted on the new layout (and probably being asking for more advice soon).

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!