Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

DCC block occupancy detection.

5860 views
9 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
DCC block occupancy detection.
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, June 4, 2005 2:10 AM
Do any of you use block occupancy detection to drive your signals?

Maybe you can suggest a system that will work with DCC.

Thanks!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, June 4, 2005 6:15 AM
I would suggest you look at Bruce Chubb's CMRI. Their DCCOD detector that was described in MR works great. It is the first step to powering signals. I have my layout 75% detection equipped. Now to build the SMINI to drive all the signals. Check it out.

The site was down, so I did not send you a link. There is a yahoo group on this subject.
Visit JCL Enterprises when you get a chance.
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Santa Fe, NM
  • 1,169 posts
Posted by Adelie on Saturday, June 4, 2005 9:13 AM
I'm still building, and am using Digitrax BDL-168 block occupancy detectors in my permanent wiring. I have not gotten around to hooking up the signal controllers or signals, and probably won't for some time yet. But, I designed the railroad and DCC "schematic" (which is largely in my head) for signalling and monitoring on a PC.

Look on Digitrax's web site for information on the BDL-168 and the SE8C (signal controller). While the information is Digitrax-specific (not for signal masts and such), it is a good reference point.

- Mark

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: CANADA
  • 2,292 posts
Posted by ereimer on Saturday, June 4, 2005 10:03 AM
i've been reading a lot about CTI , there equipment seems to be a bit less expensive than some others

http://www.cti-electronics.com/index.htm

they do make a block detector , but it looks like their system will work with other detectors , including home made
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Saturday, June 4, 2005 3:04 PM
For just a block detector you can't beat Rob Paisley's http://home.cogeco.ca/~rpaisley4/DccBODvt5.html

Less than $5 per block even if you get all the parts through him.


--Randy

Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, June 4, 2005 3:39 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by rrinker

For just a block detector you can't beat Rob Paisley's http://home.cogeco.ca/~rpaisley4/DccBODvt5.html

Less than $5 per block even if you get all the parts through him.


--Randy

I had been looking at that one too. Do you use those yourself?
It does seem simple enough for my layout, since I am not planning
on using computer control. Just something to switch my signals.
The only thing I was wondering about Rob's detector is, that you have
to fling a certain amount of loops around the transformers, the tighter the better.
I wonder how accurate and reliable that is.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Saturday, June 4, 2005 6:45 PM
I'm planning to. haven't gotten that far yet.

Bruce Chubb's DCCOD works exactly the same way. The current transformer method is, I feel (from the point of view of an electrical engineer) far superior to diode drop detectors. The problem with the diode drop detectors is they cause a slight voltage drop. Not a problem unless you have an undetected section - in which case you really should wire in the diodes anyway so the voltage is constant over the entire layout.

I did build a few of Rob's Tortoise controllers before I decide I was not goign to use pushbuttons and built something after one of Bruce Chubb's articles which only uses 2 resistors and the toggle switch yet still allows an eventual computer hookup for the dispatcher to lock out local control and remotely control the machines. Using the 556 was a stroke of brilliant insight on Rob's part, ever since so many years ago in college with my senior lab project, I have this thing against the LM339 comparator - i don;t like the darn things, they caused me so many headaches with my project (to the point where in the last week I completely redesigned that section of the circuit to use different chips). Maybe I had a bad batch, but I avoid using them whenever possible.
I would not worry that Rob would inflate the claims of the capabilities of his circuits. And he's always available, usually on the MRRELECTRONICS group on Yahoo.

--Randy

Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, June 4, 2005 7:46 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by rrinker
I'm planning to. haven't gotten that far yet.

Thanks Randy,
I sent Rob an email an ordered 2 of his detectors. I'll keep you updated on how they
work out for me.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Saturday, June 4, 2005 8:51 PM
Cool. I'd order some myself, but I REALLY have to resist going ahead with that phase of construction when I don't even have a fascia or control panels installed yet! It would be pretty silly to have occupency detection when I don't even have a way to throw my turnouts yet! I'm getting there..after all it IS a 'lifetime' hobby - or it has been for me, all the way back to home movies of me at 2 running an HO train on a loop under the xmas tree. LOL. I think the only time I have not either had a layout or been associated with one was for about 4-5 years right out of college.

--Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: CANADA
  • 2,292 posts
Posted by ereimer on Saturday, June 4, 2005 11:02 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by rrinker

For just a block detector you can't beat Rob Paisley's http://home.cogeco.ca/~rpaisley4/DccBODvt5.html

Less than $5 per block even if you get all the parts through him.


--Randy


AHHH! thank you , i've been seeing variations of Paisley's detector on the web but couldn't find anyone selling circuit boards or kits . i'm still in the planning stages but all the bits are falling into place

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!