Ballast

[2021]

I'm getting ready to ballast the first part of my new layout. I was planning to use HO size Woodland Scenics Gray Mix for my HO layout, but some say N size is more realistic (seems too "powdery" to me). Thought I might mix in a little light gray N size just to check it out. Comments please.
Ron K.

[mike33469]

Use what looks best to you its your layout . I'm using WS Medium Grey Blend with a light overspray of diluted Grimey Black, looks pretty good to me. In my yard I 'm using WS medium cinders.

[Big_Boy_4005]

It sounds like you're just looking for some reassurance, which I will gladly give. If those other guys want to use N scale ballast on their layouts, that's fine. Given the space between ties, you want a larger ballast. Woodland Scenics makes it that size so that it looks good and works well. Real ballast is 2 -3 inches in size, so WS HO may be more accurate than those guys think. I think you are in good company, using HO ballast on an HO layout.

[selector]

I agree. I used local beach sand 'cuz I wanted to incorporate natural products as much as possible...ok, and 'cuz my wife was getting uncomfortable with the rising costs.

Seriously, tho, I found that the WS ground shell looked very much the same in terms of size and shape as the washed beach sand, so I used the sand for the main line and the WS medium brown for an industrial spur. Sand is heavier and easier to both place and bru***o shape/thickness over ties, and stays put somewhat better when I sprayed glue solution over it. I was too impatient to wait until I got an eye dropper. Turns out my method only wet and fixed the upper 1/4 inch or so. Better if you will soon be adjusting the rails, replacing turnouts, etc. Unfortunately, the 'shell' is also fragile and will cave in when impacted with a heavy finger, die-cast truck, and so on. Then again, it's easy to repair; just lay more sand and spray, wipe track, and off you go.

Maybe try both and see which you prefer!