Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

code 100 & code 83,and mixing brands/codes?

1331 views
5 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: US
  • 641 posts
code 100 & code 83,and mixing brands/codes?
Posted by mikebonellisr on Friday, February 11, 2005 8:30 AM
I have a lot of code 100 track and code 100 shinohara turnouts already in place and I think I would like to try putting in some peco turnouts(the new cd83,american style).In the past I've had a few little problems when I,ve mixed different brands of track,such as atlas flex with ME flex.I always have to do a little fileing and shimming because of the slight difference in tie thickness railhead width and profile etc.I try to get the rail together so that you dont hear much of a "click" when metal wheels pass over the joint.As to mateing code 100 to code 83 ----I,ve used transition rail joiners,shims,solder and I still can,t get it acceptable.What's the "trick" or procedure for mixing codes and manufactures?
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • 785 posts
Posted by Leon Silverman on Friday, February 11, 2005 10:08 AM
I inserted a Walthers code 83 double slip switch into my code 100 layout by placing a thickness of blotter paper under the switch so that the tops of the rails were even. The joints were then soldered together.
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Elgin, IL
  • 3,677 posts
Posted by orsonroy on Friday, February 11, 2005 12:50 PM
I use all sorts of rail sizes on my layout. While my default is Peco code 75 (all switches and mainline track), I use Atlas code 83 for my staging yards (I had it handy), Atlas code 83 for all diamonds (Peco doesn't make the ones I need, and I'm not willing to pay for Shinohara or Micro Engineering), ME code 70 flextrack (cheaper than Peco 75), and ME code 50 (for spurs).

I just connect the track and go. Most of my track joints are soldered, so the track doesn't shift. Once the track's been well tested, I file the joints down until they match up. A small dip int he track doesn't hurt anything, and my trains derailment free (well, unless there's a wheel problem...!)

Ray Breyer

Modeling the NKP's Peoria Division, circa 1943

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 131 posts
Posted by scole100 on Saturday, February 12, 2005 9:00 AM
I have had to mix and match occasionally. I did try the ransition joiners once. They are not worth the money. Shimming, fileing and soldering work the best.
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • 15 posts
Posted by clif_nmra on Friday, March 4, 2005 9:04 PM
I came to the same conclusion on the tranisition joiners.
Which method do you recommend?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, March 5, 2005 9:52 AM
Just looking in the 2005 Walthers Reference Book and on page 275 there is a reference to two transistion tracks; Code 83 to 100 and Code 83 to 70. Looks like this could be a solution. Might be a little expensive. Has anybody tried these on their layout?

Rudy

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!