Login
or
Register
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Home
»
Model Railroader
»
Forums
»
Layouts and layout building
»
Code 83 vs code 100 for staging
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>[quote user="SeeYou190"]The concern is that most code 100 turnouts are older designs that could have deeper flangeways in the frogs. This coulc let the trucks dip, and could be unreliable.[/quote]</p> <p>This has not been my experience with Peco Code 100 turnouts and code 110 rp-25 wheelsets. I have also sucessfully operated code 88 wheelsets on Peco code 100 turnouts.</p> <p>In fact, my modular clubs standards for several years specified Peco code 100, Shinohara, or Micro Engineering turnouts if the turnout was located on the main line. </p> <p> </p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Users Online
There are no community member online
Search the Community
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter
See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter
and get model railroad news in your inbox!
Sign up