Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Some Advice Needed on Benchwork

4678 views
37 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2018
  • From: Northern NY (Think Upstate but even more)
  • 1,306 posts
Some Advice Needed on Benchwork
Posted by Harrison on Friday, January 15, 2021 4:27 PM

Hello all,

I am currently finalizing the plan for my future layout. It's not completely finalized yet, but the benchwork will be something along the lines of this configuration:

 I would like to use foam as a subroadbed across the entire layout. Is this feasable? 

Also, what construction should I use to support it? L-girders, frame, etc.

I had someone suggest that for the part along the wall at the right I should use hollow core doors. 

Also, the gray part is a removable staging yard. How should I construct that?

Thanks for the help.

Harrison

Homeschooler living In upstate NY a.k.a Northern NY.

Modeling the D&H in 1978.

Route of the famous "Montreal Limited"

My YouTube

  • Member since
    November 2019
  • 401 posts
Posted by The Milwaukee Road Warrior on Friday, January 15, 2021 4:38 PM

Hi Harrison,

You certainly can use pink foam for the entire layout and support it on L-girders or even on a plywood base.  

If you use 2" thick foam you can get away with not having to build a plywood "table" first (like I did.)  I tend to overbuild, but others here will be able to tell you how to space the framing members underneath better than I.  (I usually read that people using L girders space around 16"-24"...)

I basically built a table and then glued foam to the top of it.  But 2" pink is pretty sturdy and some modelers like Lou Sassi and Bill Darnaby have used it without any sort of "table" underneath, just a basic frame of 1x3 or 1x4 lumber.  

Hollow core doors is another method frequently mentioned by MR and other publications.  Very doable.  

You might want to consider how you will connect the different sections if you use different methods for some of them.  I would think it would be easier to build the whole thing with doors, or with a frame, or with L-girders, rather than a mish-mash; you could end up spending more time trying to get the door and some other framing to line up than just picking one or the other.

I don't have a staging yard at this point so I don't know, but seems that the same methods above can/will be used to build that as the rest of the layout.

Andy

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Milwaukee native modeling the Milwaukee Road in 1950's Milwaukee.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/196857529@N03/

  • Member since
    April 2018
  • From: Northern NY (Think Upstate but even more)
  • 1,306 posts
Posted by Harrison on Friday, January 15, 2021 5:10 PM

Thanks for all the advice. If I were to build the whole thing with doors, how would I make the parts that stick out (the yard, the branchline)?

Harrison

Homeschooler living In upstate NY a.k.a Northern NY.

Modeling the D&H in 1978.

Route of the famous "Montreal Limited"

My YouTube

  • Member since
    January 2017
  • From: Southern Florida Gulf Coast
  • 18,255 posts
Posted by SeeYou190 on Friday, January 15, 2021 5:32 PM

Harrison, I would suggest 2 inch thick foam over open grid framework for what you are doing.

My first layout was built on a door, and unless you get a good one, they can, and do warp. I learned that the hard way.

-Kevin

Living the dream.

  • Member since
    November 2015
  • 723 posts
Posted by UNCLEBUTCH on Friday, January 15, 2021 6:44 PM

 I have built 4 layouts with foam. Unless you already have the doors and/plywood  or can get them really cheap,I would pass,there is no need .

My 1st had ply under the foam,and the only difference from it and the others ,was every time I needed to drop a wire I needed to find the drill.The first time you try to get a wire thr a hollow core door;you'll regret it.

All you need is a frame of 1X4s. I have spaned 6ft and up to 8 [with braceing ]

For cross supports; 24in for 2in foam. 16 for 1in. I am now useing 3/4 and find 12 works better. IMO Lgrider is over kill.

I have added on to, and changed my bench work many times,As long as its  strudy,dose not move when leaned aganst, and [somewhat] level the trains do not care whats under the foam.

My current layout is kinda shaped like yous. I just built tables to fit and the screwed them together.

A little common sence will get you there faster then over thinking it

  • Member since
    March 2017
  • 8,016 posts
Posted by Track fiddler on Friday, January 15, 2021 6:57 PM

You have received some "Sound Advice" here.  I see no reason to add to it.

The only thing I would have to say is spend the extra money on the number one clear select pine 1x4's as it's worth it.  If you have tools, ripping 1/2" or 3/4" inch plywood depending on length of span for your framing is even better.  As long as you pilot hole before screwing it together not to split the plywood. 

And it sounds kind of silly but I dish soap my long screws treads.  And I buy the screws with the threadless shake by the head to draw things tight.

 

 

 

TF

  • Member since
    April 2018
  • From: Northern NY (Think Upstate but even more)
  • 1,306 posts
Posted by Harrison on Friday, January 15, 2021 8:33 PM

Thanks for all the advice and tips everyone! It sounds like an open-grid style plan is my best bet, with foam directly on top. Uncle Butch, thanks for the specifics. TF- sorry, I'm a bit lost. What would I use the plywood for? Thanks for the tip on the screws.

Harrison

Homeschooler living In upstate NY a.k.a Northern NY.

Modeling the D&H in 1978.

Route of the famous "Montreal Limited"

My YouTube

  • Member since
    August 2011
  • From: A Comfy Cave, New Zealand
  • 6,081 posts
Posted by "JaBear" on Friday, January 15, 2021 8:44 PM
Gidday Harrison, for what you’re doing I don’t really see the point of using doors, just complicates doing the wring and positioning point motors, if they’re to be used, IMO.
  
I’ve done a reasonable amount of building bases at the local club, and I’m a big fan of using 1 x 4 clear pine for the framing and 3/8” MDF for the base. The centres of the supporting 1 x4 s is about 15”.
 
The legs are either 2 x 2, though I prefer 1 x 4 L girder construction legs.
 
It would appear that I use similar screws to Track fiddler, and also soap the threads, (so that makes for at least two silly ffolk) but I also predrill the holes (undersize) and countersink the timber for the countersunk heads. My DeWalt battery drill with the appropriate screwdriver attachment does the rest. I prefer the square recessed head CSK screws.
 
I do not glue any of the joints, surprising how much a club may change its mind regarding a layout while ones away, to find the bench work that I built, destroyed, so no glue makes for reusable timber and besides I don’t think the extra strength is necessary. (It is important to remember that we’re building a layout, not an elevated dance floor!!)
 
I do also like to prime/seal the bench work as well, white underneath helps the when it comes to do the wiring. My eyesight isn’t what it used to be!!
 
OK, working with MDF. Well like everything it can be hazardous if handled incorrectly, and especially as you are a young chap, I’d urge you to wear a mask, when cutting, and also vacuum up the mess. The latter will also earn you brownie points with the Senior Management, which is no bad thing!!
 
I note that you are home schooled, and as I’m unfamiliar with the US education system, is Wood Working, (that’s what it was known as when I went to school eons ago, well it feels like eons ago) on the school curriculum? If so then there’s another (useful)subject you can tick off, while Having Fun.
Cheers, the Bear.Smile

"One difference between pessimists and optimists is that while pessimists are more often right, optimists have far more fun."

  • Member since
    March 2017
  • 8,016 posts
Posted by Track fiddler on Friday, January 15, 2021 8:45 PM

Not at all Harrison.

The clear select Pine for the 1x4 framing is the best choice.

The only thing I was saying is, ...If one has a table saw and can rip plywood for the framing members.  The 90 degree layers of wood grain opposing each other in the plywood layers, stays truly straight forever.

Overkill though.  The premium 1x4's will be just fine.

 

 

 

TF

  • Member since
    April 2018
  • From: Northern NY (Think Upstate but even more)
  • 1,306 posts
Posted by Harrison on Saturday, January 16, 2021 7:04 AM

Thanks for the info, I'm busy today but will get back to everyone later with some more questions. 

Harrison

Homeschooler living In upstate NY a.k.a Northern NY.

Modeling the D&H in 1978.

Route of the famous "Montreal Limited"

My YouTube

  • Member since
    October 2020
  • 3,489 posts
Posted by NorthBrit on Saturday, January 16, 2021 7:27 AM

I find it fascinating the use of  foam on layouts in the USA/Canada.  Here in the UK foam is a no-no  as it begins to disintegrate within a year. Thumbs Down

Not technically-minded I do not know the make-up of foam, but our foam must be different to yours.

 

An interesting plan, Harrison.   Watching with interest.

 

David

To the world you are someone.    To someone you are the world

I cannot afford the luxury of a negative thought

  • Member since
    November 2019
  • 401 posts
Posted by The Milwaukee Road Warrior on Saturday, January 16, 2021 8:16 AM

The foamboard I use is Owens-Corning XPS Foamular 150.  It won't disintegrate or otherwise breakdown.  The only possible issue I've heard raised is the flammability issue, but extra care in wiring ought to avoid that (I hope lol).  

I've also seen it said that there may be very slight shrinkage in the foamboard over an extended period of time - many years.  But basically, the XPS is immune to climate/humidity issues, doesn't flake off or break, and is very sturdy.  (The 150 or 250 number is supposedly the psi that the foamboard will handle.)

The white expanded polystyrene EPS foam breaks into small bits pretty quickly and is not an acceptable material.

Andy

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Milwaukee native modeling the Milwaukee Road in 1950's Milwaukee.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/196857529@N03/

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: west coast
  • 7,584 posts
Posted by rrebell on Saturday, January 16, 2021 10:24 AM

I use square box builds to start with and put loose foam on top, with lots of overhang, draw in layout and add any wood needed to the frame for support and then cut out the foam and glue down.  I use bead type foam on mine, no shrinkage except when first manufactured.

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Milwaukee WI (Fox Point)
  • 11,426 posts
Posted by dknelson on Saturday, January 16, 2021 10:59 AM

Most lumber and wood (and plywood) these days is bought at big box type home improvements stores that offer it for sale indoors.  My first ever layout was back when the local lumberyard stored stuff outside (under cover, ideally) but it was still damp from the outside world.  Having said that, it was higher quality stuff than just about anything I see for sale today.

Standard advice back then was to buy your wood and lumber and plywood well enough in advance that it had time to get accustomed to your indoor situation, basement or whatever.

Even though the materials for my current layout were purchased at stores where they were stored indoors (at least when I bought them they were - they clearly did store wood in unheated open sheds out back) I did take the precaution of letting the wood go through a change of seasons in my basement, except for the very first few benchwork dominos where I just couldn't wait to get going.  I think that remains good advice regardless of source of wood.  How it is stored also matters:  you don't want to create new warpage by leaning things.  Store it flat.

Looking at the OP's track plan I wondered about the small peninsulas that stick out and more particularly about just how much aisle space they have between them.  It needs to be practical access.

Dave Nelson

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Saturday, January 16, 2021 12:40 PM

 I built two layouts with foam. The first one was bacis open benchwork, just rectangular boxes 2x8, a pair of 8 foor long 1x4s for the long sides, and then another one cut to 4 pieces for crossmembers. 2' centers. On top of that I glued 2" thick foam, and it was perfectly fine, even to lean on (standing on it, no). For that one, I installed Tortoises from the top, using a method I found online that was used by some Freemo group. It worked well, but was kind of messy, routing out the opening for the Tortoise, holding the Dremel in oen hand and the shop vac hose in the other. As an experiment I took a spare Tortoise and glued it right to the bottom of the foam witht he same adhesive caulk I was using for the track and roadbed. After holding it in place 5-10 minutes, it held itself. Once the caulk fully cured - I had to hit it VERY hard to knock it off, and the caulk joiint didn;t break - it took a thin layer of the foam with it. So you could potentially attach them on the bottom just like a plywood layout, but it's going to be pretty much permanent.

 Second one, my previous layout, was built mostly the same way except the crossmembers were 1x3 so the foam sat down between the 1x4s a little bit. I also used 2 layers of 2" form, and bfore I installed the foam, I attached a sheet of 1/4" plywood to give a palce to screw switch machines and cable ties and so forth to. It was 2 layers of foam only because I originally started out making a small switching module where I would need more than 2" from the track on top to the bottom, this way I could carve away the entire top layer of foam and then down in to the second layer to get what I needed for the feature I wanted (a coal dealer where the track was up high, and the actual yard and storage bins were down at the street level below, where the street passed under a bridge on the railroad). Since I already had the one built when I moved to a larger place, I just built the rest the same way rather than scrap it and start over.

                                   --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    April 2018
  • From: Northern NY (Think Upstate but even more)
  • 1,306 posts
Posted by Harrison on Saturday, January 16, 2021 7:01 PM

Thanks for all the info everyone, it sounds like I will probably use frame benchwork with either foam or plywood on top. Now I just need to decide between plywood and foam... Considering I will want to add a few things below track level (the lake along the yard and the Saranac River), which should I use, plywood (cookie-cutter) or foam? 

Harrison

Homeschooler living In upstate NY a.k.a Northern NY.

Modeling the D&H in 1978.

Route of the famous "Montreal Limited"

My YouTube

  • Member since
    August 2011
  • From: A Comfy Cave, New Zealand
  • 6,081 posts
Posted by "JaBear" on Saturday, January 16, 2021 7:09 PM

Harrison
Considering I will want to add a few things below track level (the lake along the yard and the Saranac River), which should I use, plywood (cookie-cutter) or foam?

 

MDF!!! Whistling  Sorry Harrison I should behave myself; Embarrassed  I’d go for dimensional ply.

Apologies to Harrison for going Off Topic
 
“I find it fascinating the use of foam on layouts in the USA/Canada.  Here in the UK foam is a no-no as it begins to disintegrate within a year.”
 
Gidday David, a problem for us foreign chaps reading a fine magazine such as the Model Railroader, especially in layout construction techniques, is the use of propriety names when it comes to material used.
 
As an example, going back some years, the best practice for layout tops was ½ inch Homasote ® laid on ¾ inch ply.  In the pre internet days I never found out what Homasote ® actually was, in fact it was very similar to Pinex ®. To confuse the issue, like Pinex ®, there were actually more than one product (glued compressed Papier- Mache, simply put), it’s just that that one product “acquired” the brand name.
 
Regarding foam, (and I have the same approach as you to it, though it is obvious that many successful layouts have been/are made from it), I have observed from time to time on this Forum in particular, that foam, pink or blue, is not necessarily the same product though out North America.
 
Further Off Topic  I find the use of 1/8 inch MDF as a baseboard material, as seen on your fellow countryman’s thread intriguing.
 
Cheers, the Bear.Smile

"One difference between pessimists and optimists is that while pessimists are more often right, optimists have far more fun."

  • Member since
    November 2019
  • 401 posts
Posted by The Milwaukee Road Warrior on Saturday, January 16, 2021 10:05 PM

Isn't MDF especially susceptible to humidity, and can be destroyed by moisture or if it gets wet?  I could be wrong, I just seem to remember learning about it (and OSB) early-on when I was getting back into the hobby and wrote them off for some reason like that.. Huh?

Andy

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Milwaukee native modeling the Milwaukee Road in 1950's Milwaukee.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/196857529@N03/

  • Member since
    August 2011
  • From: A Comfy Cave, New Zealand
  • 6,081 posts
Posted by "JaBear" on Saturday, January 16, 2021 11:14 PM

The Milwaukee Road Warrior
Isn't MDF especially susceptible to humidity, and can be destroyed by moisture or if it gets wet

Gidday Andy, the Bears comfy cave is located in a “temperate maritime climate” and I personally like to seal/prime all my wooden base work, MDF included, for the very reasons you’ve mentioned.
 
That said I’ve been involved in transporting unprimed MDF topped base boards in some inclement weather and have seen no real problems.
 
But then I’m a picky perfectionist sorta cove and my aim (no different to everyone else, I guess) is to have fool proof (read Immaculate) trackwork.
 
That said, I don’t have the extremes of temperature or humidity that some of you ffolks face, so am not able to comment on how unprimed MDF would handle those conditions. But then I’d suggest that Homasote® would have the similar problems, and besides, if I was to use dimensional plywood for the top, I’d still prime it.
 
The bottom line is that if you have a material that you prefer to work with, is readily available and priced right, stick to it. Smile 
 
Cheers, the pedantic Bear.Big Smile

"One difference between pessimists and optimists is that while pessimists are more often right, optimists have far more fun."

  • Member since
    May 2008
  • From: Miles City, Montana
  • 2,249 posts
Posted by FRRYKid on Sunday, January 17, 2021 2:39 AM

I'll conceed I'm a little to the party but here are my thoughts:

1) As to the door vs. regular benchwork question: I have both on mine. The main yard is built with two old hollow core doors that are older than I am. I also have conventional sections with plywood. Just a matter of lining the tops of the sections properly and sizing the legs. Wiring is a little more difficult with the door but not too hard.

2) Get yourself a good set of woodworking tools. Square, saw (whether hand or power), a miter box if you get the hand saw, power drill, drill bits, jig saw (as you're talking about cookie cutter benchwork) and most importantly a good set of framing clamps. They hold your framing at 90 degree angles to keep everything square. Also consider some 6" C Clamps. Nice when holding sections together for attaching them.

3) I fully agree with the 1x4s for framing. When I first starting railroading, I was in a modular railroad club that used the NMRA HO modules standard with 1x4s. I have used that idea with any other benchwork I have built. One of those old modules is still in use in my current layout. (About 30 years old.) May be a headache, but if you can't get good grade 1x4s, tell your lumber yard that you want to pick the boards. (I have small town yards and they are very good about it.) I have come across some that I wouldn't wish on my worst enemy as they were warped, bowed and twisted like crazy. Don't even get me started on 2x2s. (A whole additional story on that one.)

4) Going back to the modules, consider using carriage bolts and some sort of levelers on your legs. The carriage bolts will give a resonably smooth surface and allow for easy disassembly for moving. The levelers allow for you to compensate for uneven floors. I needed them when I started my current layout in my former apartment. (I now have a house with a railroad room/garage. I still use them in there as well although not as bad.) The floor had a major slope to it. (1 1/2" to 2" by one wall. I needed 5/16" levelers to have enough play.) They allow me to have a level layout. When you drill and attach the legs make sure you mark which leg goes to which set of holes. Makes it a lot easier to reassemble later.

"The only stupid question is the unasked question."
Brain waves can power an electric train. RealFact #832 from Snapple.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Sunday, January 17, 2021 12:33 PM

 Proper painting/sealing makes a huge difference. I had a peice of homasote that was in my Mom's garage for years. Didn't get directly wet, but the end that sat on the concrete floor had absorbed moisture and was a big mushy mess. Our neighbor built a playhouse for his kids in the late 50's or early 60's out of all homasote on framing - not only did it survive for at least 30 years, it was also moved at least once from one corner of their yard to another. Outdoors. 4 seasons. It did get repainted a couple of times - pretty sure he was using typical exterior grade house paint. Leave a sheet of unfinished homasote out and go take a look after the first rainstorm - ick! But properly finished - no problem.

                                   --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    April 2018
  • From: Northern NY (Think Upstate but even more)
  • 1,306 posts
Posted by Harrison on Monday, January 18, 2021 6:41 AM

Thanks for all the info, so it looks like I have to choose between plywood, foam, MDF, and homasote. 

Which one of these is cheapest?

Which one is easiest to work with?

Thanks for the help. Also, here is a final (ish) trackplan. I have not finished planning the GP part along the wall, but I will be building the yard area first (basically from start to at least track and wiring) so I have some time to finish planning that.

 As for tools, my dad and brothers hobbies are woodworking, so we have a drill press, table saw, chop (miter) saw, etc. 

Harrison

Homeschooler living In upstate NY a.k.a Northern NY.

Modeling the D&H in 1978.

Route of the famous "Montreal Limited"

My YouTube

  • Member since
    August 2011
  • From: A Comfy Cave, New Zealand
  • 6,081 posts
Posted by "JaBear" on Monday, January 18, 2021 1:04 PM
Gidday Harrison, in your case, I should give myself a kick for “stirring the pot” and promoting MDF, even though for various reasons, it’s my material of choice for layout tops.
 
While not knowing the availability and price of your alternative choices in your neighbourhood, I’d suggest that 3/8” good quality dimensional plywood would be your safest bet.
 
That said, what would your Dad recommend?
 
Experimenting on a limited budget can end up with a bad taste, and I don’t want to see a keen young bloke as yourself becoming disillusioned and leaving the hobby.
 
Cheers, the Bear.Smile

"One difference between pessimists and optimists is that while pessimists are more often right, optimists have far more fun."

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • From: 10,430’ (3,179 m)
  • 2,277 posts
Posted by jjdamnit on Monday, January 18, 2021 1:15 PM

Hello All,

Harrison
...it looks like I have to choose between plywood, foam, MDF, and homasote.

Some personal thoughts* on each material you have listed:

  • Plywood:
  • An old standard in model railroad building.
  • Can be heavy depending on the thickness.
  • Unless you are buying Marine Grade relatively inexpensive.
  • Easy to work with.
  • Can be ripped into board lengths and used for open grid and/or L-girder benchwork.
  • Amplifies track noise if no roadbed- -cork, foam, or Homasote®- -used.
  • Holds track nails extremely well.
  • Foam (Extruded Polystyrene) AKA- -Blue Board:
  • Lightweight and less susceptible to humidity than wood or pressed paper (Homasote®).
  • Inexpensive when used alone.
  • Open grid benchwork recommended for support.
  • An underlayment of plywood might be necessary depending on the thickness of the foam and grid spacing of benchwork.
  • Easy to cut but produces "foam dust" which can get messy if cut or formed indoors.
  • Sound deadening properties even when no roadbed is used.
  • Does not hold track nails well.
  • MDF (Medium Density Fiberboard) AKA- -Particle Board:
  • Heavy for its thickness compared to plywood.
  • Inexpensive compared to plywood of similar thickness.
  • Edges chip or fray easily.
  • Susceptible to humidity and temperature changes if not sealed.
  • Requires more robust support than plywood or foam due to weight per square foot.
  • Track sound transmission between foam and plywood when used without roadbed.
  • Holds track nails extremely well.
  • Homasote® (Pressed Paper Product):
  • Comparable weight to plywood.
  • Unknown comparable cost to other materials listed.
  • Extremely susceptible to moisture and humidity. Turns to mush when comes in contact with water.
  • Produces a fine dust when cut and can produce frayed edges.
  • Similar sound-absorbing properties to foam when used without roadbed.
  • Holds track nails well.

(*These are my personal thoughts, observations, and opinions based on my experience with these materials. I don't care if you disagree or have other opinions, these are mine.)

I began my most recent 4'x8' pike on a piece of 5/8-inch MDF.

On top of this I used 2-inch Blue Foam along with foam roadbed.

This pike sits on top of the bed in the computer-/spare bed-/train-room.

It was heavy and required an external frame of Luan plywood to avoid sagging.

This produced a 4'x8' base that weighed over 100-lbs!

Recently I ditched the MDF for 1"x4" open grid benchwork with 1/4-inch plywood supporting the 2-inch foam base. The grid spacing is 24- x 32-inches.

This configuration has reduced the weight of the pike considerably.

Hope this helps.

"Uhh...I didn’t know it was 'impossible' I just made it work...sorry"

  • Member since
    April 2018
  • From: Northern NY (Think Upstate but even more)
  • 1,306 posts
Posted by Harrison on Monday, January 18, 2021 3:28 PM

Thanks Bear and JJ, that helps a lot!

Harrison

Homeschooler living In upstate NY a.k.a Northern NY.

Modeling the D&H in 1978.

Route of the famous "Montreal Limited"

My YouTube

  • Member since
    May 2008
  • From: Miles City, Montana
  • 2,249 posts
Posted by FRRYKid on Tuesday, January 19, 2021 2:10 AM

Even though you do have the miter saw, I still would think about straightening out a couple sections of the framework in your plan. The two in question are the right hand side of the section with Dock Street and the left hand side with S. Junction Road. Assembling 45 degree corners and 90s are not too hard but if you're attaching benchwork with screws, the odd angles would make driving the screws a bit of a challenge IMO.

"The only stupid question is the unasked question."
Brain waves can power an electric train. RealFact #832 from Snapple.
  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 8,863 posts
Posted by riogrande5761 on Tuesday, January 19, 2021 6:47 AM

JJ left out OSB, which comes in varying thicknesses and 4x8 sheets.  I've been using it on all my layouts and it's worked very well and is cheaper than plywood and generally is good and flat.

Rio Grande.  The Action Road  - Focus 1977-1983

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Tuesday, January 19, 2021 8:34 AM

FRRYKid

Even though you do have the miter saw, I still would think about straightening out a couple sections of the framework in your plan. The two in question are the right hand side of the section with Dock Street and the left hand side with S. Junction Road. Assembling 45 degree corners and 90s are not too hard but if you're attaching benchwork with screws, the odd angles would make driving the screws a bit of a challenge IMO.

 

 Good point. A 45 degree angle isn't too bad if you predrill the screwholes (and have a proper clamp to hold it), but those oddball angles - square that off, make the root of the peninsula a 90, and then when you put fascia on it, curve the fascia so it has a nice curved appearance even if the 'bones' behind are simply square joints. Easy enough to do if the fascia is made with a bendable material like Masonite or whatever equivalent material they have in your local stores - the stuff I've been getting, Lowes just labels as 'hardboard'

                                    --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    January 2012
  • From: Edgewood, WA
  • 54 posts
Posted by 2ManyHobbeez on Tuesday, January 19, 2021 10:46 AM

I am building an extension to my layout and am trying some new techniques. The extension is mostly just 2' x 8' free standing modules, bolted together. I am building the top as just a box frame of 1x4 lumber. I found some material at HD in the firewood department that is listed as being exterior trim boards. It is wood of some kind, finger jointed, no knots and primed all over in gray. It is smooth on 3 sides. It is straight and might remain that way being primed and finger jointed. Not expensive either.

I rabbeted the box all around and dropped in a piece of 7/16 OSB, smooth side down such that the OSB is flush with the top of the surrounding rails. I glued that in place. That part is extremely sturdy. Don't let anyone tell you that OSB is not good for this application. It's strong enough so that I don't feel any need to put cross beams under the OSB. I painted the bottom of the OSB with white primer just to lighten it up under there.

Pink foam goes on top, screwed to the OSB. Because I have the OSB underneath, I can cut ditches and streams into the foam without worrying about its structural strength.

I had a bad experience with pink foam shrinkage in the past. It buckled my track. So this time I am cutting saw kerfs across the foam, nearly all the way through, leaving about 1/4 inch uncut. I'm cutting from the bottom side so the top will remain smooth. This is an experiment. I expect that it will limit the effect of any shrinkage to small, manageable and counteractive increments. I haven't cut it yet but I think I will cut it every foot (7 kerfs across the 8 foot length).

george

Edgewood, WA

Tags: benchwork , Foam , framing , OSB
  • Member since
    September 2014
  • From: 10,430’ (3,179 m)
  • 2,277 posts
Posted by jjdamnit on Tuesday, January 19, 2021 12:40 PM

Hello All,

riogrande5761
JJ left out OSB...

Yes, I did because I have no personal experience with that particular material for building a layout.

Also, the OP didn't list it as a possible material for use.

In past posts I have been accused of, "spreading false information" so I didn't want to comment on something I have no experience with.

Hope this helps.

 

"Uhh...I didn’t know it was 'impossible' I just made it work...sorry"

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!