Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Layout Feedback/Help

1843 views
15 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2020
  • 14 posts
Layout Feedback/Help
Posted by Contrails on Wednesday, March 11, 2020 3:33 AM

Howdy yall.  My father and I are starting in on a new layout in a garage we built last summer.  It's my first layout and his 3rd or 4th (however he's been out of the hobby for almost 30 years and was a member of a large club in California when he lived there).  I've been using the Rio Verde layout (its in the database) as a loose template and changing a few things to adapt it for HO and our room size/tastes.  Looking for general feedback as well as fixing the scenario below.  We're running 24" main line radius' (there are couple spots where we dropped it to 23" to make it fit) and 20" yard/spur/siding radius'.

The main problem I'm having is laying in a logging camp however and am looking for ideas.  For the logging camp/lumber mill area I plan on using an two EMD SW1200s as my main power with either skeleton bunks, flat cars, or possibly indepentant trucks.  Help?  

Below is a big overview of the layout, and then two close up shots of the lower and upper portions.  Main access will be from the South.  Garage door on the West, East side will be a wall walling off the back portion of the garage, however we plan to build a access hole/hatch/window/something to get at the deeper parts of the layout.

Also a list of things that are have to's for us:

  • wye
  • saddle
  • lumber/logging area
  • medium to largeish yard
  • I like mountainous running with helpers

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: west coast
  • 7,667 posts
Posted by rrebell on Saturday, March 14, 2020 9:36 AM

Try to make the walkways 30" or as  close to it as possible, this can be done with a little modification.

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Saturday, March 14, 2020 11:21 AM

You didn’t mention DC or DCC, if DCC you will need a lot of auto reversers.
 
I like the track plan!  I always wanted a large layout but never had the room of one.
 
If this will be a long term layout make sure you figure on old age problems.  I did and if I had not done so I wouldn’t be able to work on my layout now.  Knee and back pain don’t give you warnings early on.
 
 
 
Mel
 
 
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.
 
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern CA Bay Area
  • 4,387 posts
Posted by cuyama on Saturday, March 14, 2020 11:42 AM

Welcome to the forum. Your first few posts are moderated, so it may take a while for them to appear, especially over a weekend.

In your space, fewer turnback curves ("blobs") would improve access and aisle widths as well as eliminating the tightest curves on the mainline.

Tracks are likely too close to the edge of the benchwork in a few spots as-drawn, adding a safe distance would reduce aisle widths further.

Good luck with your layout.

Byron

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 1,500 posts
Posted by ROBERT PETRICK on Saturday, March 14, 2020 12:20 PM

Welcome to the forum. Good to see multi-generational interest in the World's Greatest Hobby.

Just a quick observation . . . The sketches don't show access hatches or popups, but the reach-in distances might be a concern. Pretty far to the back corner tracks. And as Cuyama mentioned, I like to keep at least 3" clearance to the aisle edge of the layout. You know, for overhang.

Robert

LINK to SNSR Blog


  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Saturday, March 14, 2020 1:08 PM

ROBERT PETRICK

And as Cuyama mentioned, I like to keep at least 3" clearance to the aisle edge of the layout. You know, for overhang.

Robert

 

Robert might be referencing my pot belly overhang, it does get in the way even with the track at 3” in.
 
 
 
Mel
 
 
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.
 

 

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 1,500 posts
Posted by ROBERT PETRICK on Saturday, March 14, 2020 1:23 PM

RR_Mel
ROBERT PETRICK

And as Cuyama mentioned, I like to keep at least 3" clearance to the aisle edge of the layout. You know, for overhang.

Robert

Robert might be referencing my pot belly overhang, it does get in the way even with the track at 3” in.
 
Mel

Hey Mel-

On behalf of us high-caliber men everywhere, I'm gonna quote the late Tip O'Neill, " . . . there's no shame to shop in the Double XXs."

Robert

LINK to SNSR Blog


  • Member since
    March 2020
  • 14 posts
Posted by Contrails on Saturday, March 14, 2020 3:33 PM

RR_Mel

You didn’t mention DC or DCC, if DCC you will need a lot of auto reversers.
 

 
We will be using DCC.  That was something thats was bit of a concern.
 
RR_Mel

You didn’t mention DC or DCC, if DCC you will need a lot of auto reversers.
 
I like the track plan!  I always wanted a large layout but never had the room of one.
 
 
Thanks!  We built a large garage/mother in law in the back of my property last summer.  My folks are living above the garage and the garage below is largely un used as I have a couple large bays on my house.  As my father hasn't had the room or opportunity for a layout in almost 3 decades, I thought this would be a good use of that space.
 
RR_Mel

 
If this will be a long term layout make sure you figure on old age problems.  I did and if I had not done so I wouldn’t be able to work on my layout now.  Knee and back pain don’t give you warnings early on.
 
 
 
 
Thats one reason we had larger walk ways.  My father as two bionic knees and is of a distinguished age.  Stick out tongue
  • Member since
    March 2020
  • 14 posts
Posted by Contrails on Saturday, March 14, 2020 3:38 PM

cuyama

Welcome to the forum. Your first few posts are moderated, so it may take a while for them to appear, especially over a weekend.

 

Thanks!  Roger that.

 

cuyama

In your space, fewer turnback curves ("blobs") would improve access and aisle widths as well as eliminating the tightest curves on the mainline.

Tracks are likely too close to the edge of the benchwork in a few spots as-drawn, adding a safe distance would reduce aisle widths further.

Good luck with your layout.

Byron

 

 

That was something I actually discussed with pops after I posted this.  I think I may drop the upper of the two right 'blobs' down and make them overlapping.  This would make more room, but also give me an enlongated space to lay in the logging camp.  Also this'll make walkways larger.

  • Member since
    March 2020
  • 14 posts
Posted by Contrails on Saturday, March 14, 2020 3:42 PM

ROBERT PETRICK

Welcome to the forum. Good to see multi-generational interest in the World's Greatest Hobby.

Just a quick observation . . . The sketches don't show access hatches or popups, but the reach-in distances might be a concern. Pretty far to the back corner tracks. And as Cuyama mentioned, I like to keep at least 3" clearance to the aisle edge of the layout. You know, for overhang.

Robert

 

 

Thanks, as a kid we'd go train chasing up in the Sandpoint, ID area and along the Columbia River.  I jumped to aircraft as a teen and haven't looked back.  Since the parents moved in to a mother in law we built, and with a grandson now in the mix, we're looking back into trains now as a family activity.

 

We shouldn't need access as on each side (except the North side, is open to either the garage door, or a drop away backdrop.  I did a test for reach, and for me I could easily reach out and grab a car at 34" at that table height.  To put in some wiggle room I dropped that to 30".  More?  Bench work was a rough sketch, that'll get adjusted down the road.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Bradford, Ontario
  • 15,797 posts
Posted by hon30critter on Sunday, March 15, 2020 11:10 PM

Hi Contrails!

Welcome to the forums!!     Welcome

First, I will say that I love the overall idea of having lots of depth in your scenes and lots of single track mainline, so please don't take my comments too harshly.

I will second Byron's suggestion of making your aisles wider, especially if there are going to be two (or more) of you operating the layout. There are currently a lot of places where two people simply cannot pass. You will constantly be having to get out of each other's way. Also as Byron suggested, if your track is that close to the fascia and your aisles are that narrow, you will be knocking trains off the rails on a regular basis unless you use plexiglass to protect the trains.

You are also using a switchback in the upper blob to feed an industry, and the tracks leading to that industry have another track crossing them. That arrangement may make for some interesting operating, but the whole thing seems to be very awkward. In order to keep the crossings clear you won't be able to drop more than a couple of cars at the upper industry.

My 2 Cents

Dave

I'm just a dude with a bad back having a lot of fun with model trains, and finally building a layout!

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern CA Bay Area
  • 4,387 posts
Posted by cuyama on Monday, March 16, 2020 1:58 PM

Contrails
I think I may drop the upper of the two right 'blobs' down and make them overlapping.

That will likely help, but a different footprint overall would also be worth considering, in my humble opinion. A spiral something like a "G" often creates fewer "mandatory" turnback blob curves and allows more room for broader, more realistic curves to suggest a mountain locale.

Newcomers to layout design often jump to the details too soon, I believe, which can limit the opportunity to consider a broader range of options.

Good luck with your layout.

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 2,360 posts
Posted by kasskaboose on Monday, March 16, 2020 4:29 PM

Playing the Devil's Advocate here, the aisles are fine.  I have one aisle that's 18" for 5 feet before becoming 30, so at worst case, people walk slightly sideways.  Most people don't have shoulders wider than 21".

  • Member since
    December 2015
  • From: Shenandoah Valley
  • 9,094 posts
Posted by BigDaddy on Monday, March 16, 2020 6:09 PM

kasskaboose
Most people don't have shoulders wider than 21".

Snork (the sound of a beverage coming out my nose)  The issue occurs 2 feet lower on the body, front and back, a little lower on the back side.  Big Smile

 

Henry

COB Potomac & Northern

Shenandoah Valley

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 2,360 posts
Posted by kasskaboose on Monday, March 16, 2020 9:06 PM

BigDaddy
 
kasskaboose
Most people don't have shoulders wider than 21".

 

Snork (the sound of a beverage coming out my nose)  The issue occurs 2 feet lower on the body, front and back, a little lower on the back side.  Big Smile

 

 Got it!  You win the Internet my friend. So needed that laugh! Stick out tongue

  • Member since
    March 2020
  • 14 posts
Posted by Contrails on Monday, March 16, 2020 10:31 PM

BigDaddy

 

 
kasskaboose
Most people don't have shoulders wider than 21".

 

Snork (the sound of a beverage coming out my nose)  The issue occurs 2 feet lower on the body, front and back, a little lower on the back side.  Big Smile

 

 

 

I think I actually LOLd.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!