Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

In Need of Curved HO Bridge - Ideas?

817 views
14 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January, 2018
  • 70 posts
In Need of Curved HO Bridge - Ideas?
Posted by kenben on Monday, October 07, 2019 6:17 PM

I have a 22" radi curved track that is elevated at 4" above the track below, which passes underneath it at an angle. The length of the curved bridge Iʻm looking for would need to be about 8" to 10". Ideas please???

  • Member since
    August, 2003
  • From: Collinwood, Ohio, USA
  • 8,751 posts
Posted by gmpullman on Monday, October 07, 2019 7:56 PM

You'd probably have to go with a skewed plate girder bridge, half-through type. Since the bridge would be straight and the track curved you would have to widen the distance between the girders to allow for the overhang of cars passing through the girders.

Since the track below passes at an angle you would want to offset (skew) the girders so as not to have too long of a span.

Central Valley makes some bridge girders that may work:

https://www.shop.cvmw.com/72ftPlateGirders-2-1903-1.htm

You could then scratch build a deck either using open beams or cheat a little and use a ballasted deck and simply make the deck out of solid styrene or thin modelers plywood.

Here's a link to a sketch of what I'm thinking of:

https://www.steelconstruction.info/File:R5_Fig8.png

 

Good Luck, Ed

  • Member since
    February, 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 21,792 posts
Posted by selector on Tuesday, October 08, 2019 1:58 AM

You can't curve a bridge deck, nor its supporting structures. You have to build it wide enough so that the ties supporting the rails, and the rails themselves, can curve along the widened deck and still meet the gauge loading.  Or, if you have an intervening supporting pier or pylon, or bent frame, you can run angled stringers that support the ties and rails.  You still curve the tie bed and rails, but the stringers supporting the ties can be lapped and angled between two outer pairs of stringers.  If this sounds like what you'd like to do, I can post a diagram.

  • Member since
    April, 2019
  • From: Pacific Northwest
  • 628 posts
Posted by SPSOT fan on Tuesday, October 08, 2019 7:36 AM

Using a widened deck girder bridge like other have sudgusted seems to be an easy way. However, and  alternative is to use a wood trestle, that you make curves. I’ve seen a number of picture of similar items. Of course this approach requires you to scratchbuild the trestle.

Regards, Isaac

I model my railroad and you model yours! I model my way and you model yours!

  • Member since
    September, 2003
  • 8,441 posts
Posted by Overmod on Tuesday, October 08, 2019 8:06 AM

In practice this is the sort of thing that any savvy railroad would replace with a fill ASAP (with a portal liner for the skew track).  This presupposes enough vertical clearance from the loading-gage limit on the bottom track that you have room for the drainage system under the ballast above the top of the portal liner.  A somewhat extreme example of this is the replacement for the failed Howe truss at Ashtabula over the years -- it may not be pretty, but it is HIGHLY unlikely to fail or even wash out significantly, and 'repair' is simple and straightforward.

If the clearance is restricted, you're looking at one of the bridge designs with relatively thin 'bottom chord' and deck structure.  This is a bit complicated by the combination of curve and skew; the lateral deck members in particular will need to be stronger while kept as 'shallow' as possible, an interesting problem in statics.  Note that this would not preclude you from having a ballasted deck under the track, perhaps built like the proposed ballasted-deck conversion for the Merchants Bridge in St. Louis.

This might be a place for a little 'drama' design-wise: consider adapting bowstring trusses for the vertical members.  It does occur to me that with a little tinkering of abutments (e.g., pockets for the physical hinge supports on a 'long' corner), if you have a span of 8 to 10 inches and not too radical a skew you might be able to build the bridge itself unskewed (there are precedents in actual railroad-bridge engineering for this) between actual hinge supports, with the track skew accommodated entirely under the wider span (with tight clearances on 'contrapositive' abutment corners)

BTW, if you want to see examples of how sharp curves are accommodated on bridge decks, look at some of the aerial photos of the aftermath of the Amtrak 502 Talgo wreck in Washington.  That's almost a textbook example of how you engineer the 'maximum speed' track curve for a given infrastructure situation.

  • Member since
    July, 2006
  • From: 4610 Metre's North of the Fortyninth on the left coast of Canada
  • 6,035 posts
Posted by BATMAN on Wednesday, October 09, 2019 4:43 PM

I had a curve on a hill so built my own.

 

You just make it wider to accept the curved track.

Brent

It's not the age honey, it's the mileage.

https://www.youtube.com/user/BATTRAIN1

DrW
  • Member since
    January, 2008
  • From: Lubbock, TX
  • 142 posts
Posted by DrW on Wednesday, October 09, 2019 7:18 PM

Curved viaducts are not uncommon in Europe, especially in the Alps. Mostly, they are made from stone and they are truly built in curved form; some have rather dramatic curve radii. If you don't mind the "European look", you can get models from Faller, Kibri, etc. (all sold by US dealers).

 

Image result for curved viaduct faller HO scale

  • Member since
    September, 2014
  • From: 10,430’ (3,179 m)
  • 1,047 posts
Posted by jjdamnit on Wednesday, October 09, 2019 7:21 PM

Hello All,

Have you considered a viaduct?

Because these structures are built of stone they can follow a curve. 

If the track below is a single line this would not be difficult to model.

That being said, steel bridges can be curved and even super-elevated.

I can think of several prototypical examples here in Colorado.

The first example of a curved span would be the Horseshoe Curve Bridge on the George Town Loop scenic railroad.

Yes, the structural members are straight but they are arranged to make a curve.

A second, and not so famous curved and super-elevated bridge in Colorado is on the abandoned line between Victor, Colorado and Highway 50; east of Cañon City, on the Phantom Canyon Road.

Just north of the town site of Adelaide, Colorado, there is a railway bridge that is now part of the roadway.

The bridge is a curved structure made from straight members. In addition to being curved it is also super-elevated.

When I was exploring the foundations of this bridge I discovered the bents are in a triangular configuration.

Rather than the bents being parallel to each other and perpendicular to the trackage the bents on the outer radius are on separate footings while the single bent on the inner radius is on a single footing. 

Also the outer bents are taller than the inner bents, thus creating a super-elevated bridge.

This triangular support configuration in steel could be replicated to accommodate a larger radius.

Hope this helps.

"Uhh...I didn’t know it was 'impossible' I just made it work...sorry"

  • Member since
    February, 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 21,792 posts
Posted by selector on Wednesday, October 09, 2019 11:57 PM

I said in my earlier post that you can't curve bridges that use stringers and pylons or intermediate piers. This means trusses, girders, and trestles.  Here is an image showing what I mean.  As I said, you CAN curve the rails, but you must widen the deck for clearances.

 

 

  • Member since
    January, 2017
  • From: Southern Florida Gulf Coast
  • 5,280 posts
Posted by SeeYou190 on Thursday, October 10, 2019 6:32 AM

On our layouts we do things the prototypes would not for various reasons and considerations.

.

Even though curved bridges of some styles do not exist in the real world, reasonable curved bridges can be made for our model railroad layouts, and they might not look the best, but if they make a desired track arrangement work, so be it.

.

If you photograph them from the right angle, they will look OK, and no one needs to be the wiser.

.

-Kevin

.

Wink Happily modeling my STRATTON & GILLETTE RAILROAD. A Class A line located in a personal fantasy world of semi-plausible nonsense on Tuesday, August 3rd, 1954.

  • Member since
    February, 2015
  • From: Ludington, MI
  • 423 posts
Posted by Water Level Route on Thursday, October 10, 2019 8:26 AM

What is your era?  Would a curved trestle be appropriate?

Mike

  • Member since
    September, 2003
  • From: California - moved to North Carolina 2018
  • 4,237 posts
Posted by DSchmitt on Thursday, October 10, 2019 4:28 PM

Need to see scale plan and if roadbed/tracks built photos

I tried to sell my two cents worth, but no one would give me a plug nickel for it.

I don't have a leg to stand on.

  • Member since
    March, 2017
  • 2,371 posts
Posted by Track fiddler on Thursday, October 10, 2019 5:16 PM

Straight sections with a common angle and support underneath each section create a curved bridge prototypically for all railroad bridges.

Sometimes the width of the bridge has to be a little wider to accommodate that for side to side clearance.

 

 

 TF

  • Member since
    July, 2019
  • 14 posts
Posted by nwsisu on Friday, October 11, 2019 9:39 AM

If you have access to a 3D printer, you can design your own, or download a model of the internet, and modify it.

Or you can just design the bridge and pay a printing service to print it for you.

I designed and printed my own bridge. Looks ok I guess, but not too prototypical, I might redesign and replace it eventually.

3D-printed HO train bridge

  • Member since
    January, 2017
  • From: Southern Florida Gulf Coast
  • 5,280 posts
Posted by SeeYou190 on Friday, October 11, 2019 10:01 AM

nwsisu
Looks ok I guess, but not too prototypical, I might redesign and replace it eventually.

.

I like it. I have not tried to design anything for 3D printing yet, but that was a perfect project for it.

.

-Kevin

.

Wink Happily modeling my STRATTON & GILLETTE RAILROAD. A Class A line located in a personal fantasy world of semi-plausible nonsense on Tuesday, August 3rd, 1954.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!