Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Starting out with HO/DCC

1588 views
9 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2019
  • 3 posts
Starting out with HO/DCC
Posted by spc337 on Wednesday, July 10, 2019 12:38 PM

My ambition is to build a HO Scale Layout for my son and I to build and grow.  I'm completely new to HO/DCC but handy enough not to be too antimidated.  However, patience isn't a strong suit and to keep my son engaged, I'm looking for a more prescriptive track plan for us to build over the summer.  He is asking for the Milwaukee #261 Steam Locomotive (or the Daylight).  He'll mostly appreciate continuous runs but I would like to run at least two locomotives at a time.  I've considered some of the Woodlands kits but they are limited to 4x8 and I already have a 6x12 table from an O scale we will retire.  Are there any other scenary kits/track plans I should know about?  Are they any trackplan sources that include wiring recommendations?  I don't need to ultimate setup with signaling etc.  but crossings/switches along with tunnels and probably two levels would be great.

Thanks

 

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Wednesday, July 10, 2019 5:29 PM

I would start by looking at track plans published on the Atlas site, and then look at what Walthers has on their site for scenery materials.  There's also the SDG site that publishes several track plans that you might find useful and appealing.

It will get costly if you go with the kit track sets with the fake plastic ballast, but it will be quick.  Few of us end up happy with that choice over time, but it certainly fills the ticket if you are impatient.

  • Member since
    December 2015
  • From: Shenandoah Valley
  • 9,094 posts
Posted by BigDaddy on Wednesday, July 10, 2019 5:30 PM

There is a lot in your post.

Continuous running is probably the best choice for your son.   Operations are like single malt scotch, it is an aquired taste.

Signaling is complicated in DCC.  Arduino seems to be the best way to go, but there is a learning curve; I haven't tried to master the programing. You won't find track plans with signaling included.

I never got the bug to have 2 levels.  Helixs are all the rage, but they are huge space hogs.  A one level layout puts the tracks at your ideal eye level.  A two level layout may put both tracks at suboptimal levels.

There are a lot more options in 6x12 than 4x8.  However if the layout is up against the wall, you can't reach more than 30" to fix a derailment.  Removeable sections so you can "pop up" are an option, but as you get older, it is a much less desireable option.

There have been a couple threads on problems assembling WS kits with respect to the fit of the track. 

There is a trackplan data base on this forum. 

Henry

COB Potomac & Northern

Shenandoah Valley

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Wednesday, July 10, 2019 8:06 PM

John Allen is my mentor and I have always liked his original 3’7” x 6’8” layout, it has a little bit of everything and easy to make larger.
 
John Allen Memorial site:
 
 
His original layout, click twice on the picture to super enlarge:
 
 
It’s a rather easy to build as well as to wire for DCC or DC.  It doesn’t have any difficult track work that requires special or advanced wiring.
 
It has a grade with mountains and tunnels, bridges and a trestle as well as a lake and turntable with a engine house or roundhouse.  The mainline is a over lapping continuous loop for continuous running.  The station area can be enlarged as well as the turntable/yard area in a larger footprint of 6’ x 12’.
 
 
Mel
 
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.
 
  • Member since
    April 2009
  • From: Staten Island NY
  • 1,734 posts
Posted by joe323 on Thursday, July 11, 2019 6:35 AM

 How old is your son? And what is your budget? How fast do you need the layout to be up and running?

So many questions So little space!

Joe Staten Island West 

  • Member since
    July 2019
  • 45 posts
Posted by nwsisu on Thursday, July 11, 2019 8:42 AM

I'm also a beginner, on my 2nd layout. On the 1st one, I did everything wrong, but hopefully getting at least half of the things done correctly on the current build :).

Due to limited space, my layout is 5x9 feet, HO scale, with 2 main levels and a 3rd mountain level.

Each main level has an outer loop, and then there is a inner loop connecting the 2 levels. Then there will be a 3rd shorter loop going around a mountain.

My tracks are 18" radius. I'm aware of the limitations, and my selection of engines and cars are suitable for the small radius. You should have room for larger curves on your layout.

Since I started over, I decided to do DCC.

I designed my project in a way that I can run the trains on the lower loop while constructing the layout, although the loop is temporarily cut off while I'm building a bay and a bridge in one corner of the layout.

I could show my layout once I upload it somewhere (hopefully by this weekend). My layout is not perfect, but sounds like similar to what you are looking for, and might at least  give you some ideas.

  • Member since
    July 2019
  • 45 posts
Posted by nwsisu on Thursday, July 11, 2019 1:06 PM

Here are a few pictures of my layout. These are not professionally made, and I am sure they contain flaws. I am just posting them to give you some ideas:
9x5 feet layout, upper level
9x5 layout, lower level
9x5 layout at an early stage in construction

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Thursday, July 11, 2019 4:31 PM

Keep in mind the steam engines you mentioned require a 22" minimum radius curve I believe, so you could just fit an oval that would work for those engines on a 4 by 8 layout. Those would also be big engines to be hauling the relatively short trains you'd be running on a layout that size.

Stix
  • Member since
    July 2019
  • 45 posts
Posted by nwsisu on Thursday, July 11, 2019 5:01 PM

I had a 4-8-4 on my first layout. It worked on the 22" but could not be run on the 18" radius. I'm sure there are nice, smaller steam engines, such as a 4-6-0, that fit better on the smaller layouts. 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: AU
  • 713 posts
Posted by xdford on Friday, July 12, 2019 10:56 PM

Hello SPC,

I have sent you a PM -  have  free article that has a few ideas for your layout that you might be able to use in an expansion of a 4x8 to a 5x9 or bigger that would allow you to grow your layout and keep your sons interest

Regards from Australia

Trevor http://xdford.freeasphost.net/stag01.html for your interest

 

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!