Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

What if the TAR Branch was done in O?

1764 views
3 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: US
  • 973 posts
What if the TAR Branch was done in O?
Posted by jmbjmb on Monday, December 4, 2017 10:48 PM

The TAR Branch has become one of my favorite project  layouts from MR.  So while reading Tony Koester's Trains of Thought this month on larger scales (by the way Tony, when are you switching to modeling that New England branch in O that's always in the back of your mind?) I started wonderng what would be done differently if the TAR Branch was done in a scale larger than HO.  On the one hand it's small enough to still fit in a spare room even in a larger scale.  But on the other, it does get a bit wide and would be out of reach in larger scales if we kept to a reasonable access.  Just speculating out loud here but would it need to be broken into perhaps several appendeges with walk space between them?

jim

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 10,582 posts
Posted by mlehman on Tuesday, December 5, 2017 8:29 AM

Been out of O since 1970 when I sold the family's legacy Lionel to finance my HO dreams. But I would swap and make the main against the wall/backdrop. Then I would let the warehouse complex that includes Atlas Supply is part of becme a penisula, with a short "aisle" between it and the WSS freight house. That way you could still reach in across the small line of buildings starting with H.G. Wright, etc to work your trains on the main.

Good issue, with a nice selection of subjects, from the WSS to the T&P layouts, with some P. K. Soeberg scratchbuilding showing just how simple it can be and YES! , A RR you Can Model!

Would not be near so compact as the HO version, but could work very well teamed up with staging, maybe even double-ended staging with an around the wall connection if the space can be dedicated to it.

Mike Lehman

Urbana, IL

Moderator
  • Member since
    May 2009
  • From: Waukesha, WI
  • 1,764 posts
Posted by Steven Otte on Tuesday, December 5, 2017 9:02 AM

The deepest part of the layout is the middle, where you have five parallel tracks and two structures stacked up. If more length was available, I'm sure that turnouts could be shifted right or left so that some of these features were no longer parallel, but adjacent. The Atlas Supply Co. and its two spurs could go farther to the left, so the three small industries in the middle could go against the backdrop, for instance. Then the freight house and cold storage could be rotated  parallel to the main line, maybe even represented by building flats.

--
Steven Otte, Model Railroader senior associate editor
sotte@kalmbach.com

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: North Dakota
  • 9,592 posts
Posted by BroadwayLion on Tuesday, December 5, 2017 12:31 PM

My Brother lives in Washington NC, and is near enough to the Tar River / Pamlico Sound. He likes to water ski on the Tar, smoother water fewer boats. I was out on the Tar river in October. This is the railroad bridge across the Pamlico sound.

 

ROAR

The Route of the Broadway Lion The Largest Subway Layout in North Dakota.

Here there be cats.                                LIONS with CAMERAS

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!