Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
I don´t think you´ll find 4 by 8-haters in here - the more experienced among us only agree that it is not the best use of a given space for a layout. Actually, MR has re-discovered the 4 by 8. The February 2011 edition shows a very well done layout of that size and also has some interesting track plan ideas in it - it´s worth getting a copy! As to the intended use of Roco track, there are some points you should consider: <ul> <li>Coupling will be an issue on the tight radii. They are intended for truck mounted couplers, which most of the European rolling stock has, but is not common with US equipment.</li> <li>Tie spacing and tie arrangement at turnouts follows European practice, which is very much different from US-style.</li> <li>Sourcing may be an issue, as well as cost - that stuff is expensive.</li> </ul> I personally see no benefit in using Roco track.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag

Update Reply

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Model Railroader Newsletter See all

Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!