Login
or
Register
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Home
»
Model Railroader
»
Forums
»
Layouts and layout building
»
Reverse Wye
Reverse Wye
2001 views
9 replies
Order Ascending
Order Descending
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Reverse Wye
Posted by
Anonymous
on Friday, June 4, 2004 10:06 AM
I need some help planning a reversing wye. I see by many track plans these can be built in 3-4 square feet. While planning, I have used all combinations of #4, #5 and #6 turnouts and all combinations of #4 and #6 Wye's, but still can not get ti fit in less than 5 linear feet plus the reversing segment. Can any one help me reduce the area needed?
Thanks Rossmk
Reply
Edit
ndbprr
Member since
September 2002
7,475 posts
Posted by
ndbprr
on Friday, June 4, 2004 10:15 AM
What size radius track are you using for the curves? the only way you are going to tighten one up is to reduce the curvature on the legs or have one on the outside of a curve.
Reply
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Friday, June 4, 2004 10:25 AM
to: ndbprr,
Thanks for the reply, have used 24", 26" and 28" readius curves with no luck. I have not use 22" or less because I will be turning trains with 4-6-2,
4-6-4 and 4-8-4 steam loco's. I think most of my brass and other engines can handle 22" radius but not convinced going below 24" is a good idea. Any thoughts?
Reply
Edit
passengerfan
Member since
March 2004
From: Central Valley California
2,841 posts
Posted by
passengerfan
on Friday, June 4, 2004 2:28 PM
Friend of mine solved the reversing problem by purchasing a stacking washer & dryer for his wife and used this space in the laundry room for a reverse loop. I believe it cost about $800. 00 for this solution to reversing problem. Was it worth it he believes it was. Don't no if you can do the same but is it worth it for 4 feet?
Reply
IRONROOSTER
Member since
June 2003
From: Culpeper, Va
8,201 posts
Posted by
IRONROOSTER
on Friday, June 4, 2004 5:04 PM
You can narrow the width by using a crossing. That is two regular turnouts face each other closer than normal and the two diverging curves cross each other and then curve back to a Y turnout. This will increase the tail length, however. And you have to be careful about S curves. Use a double curved crossing (not commercially available that I know of) to keep it more compact.
Enjoy
Paul
If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
Reply
warner brook
Member since
October 2003
From: mt.jewett,pa
78 posts
Posted by
warner brook
on Friday, June 11, 2004 6:38 PM
[%-)] hi iron rooster
would you care to draw that configuration, i had a hard time trying to figure it out by just your explanation.thank you. roy
dutchman
Reply
IRONROOSTER
Member since
June 2003
From: Culpeper, Va
8,201 posts
Posted by
IRONROOSTER
on Friday, June 11, 2004 11:42 PM
Well I'm not sure how to paste a drawing in. So I'll trying drawing with text.
____________________________________________
...................................T............T
.....................................\........../
.......................................\....../
.........................................X
...................................../........................................../.............................................|.............|
...................................\.........../
......................................\ ...../
........................................\ /
.........................................Y
..........................................|
..........................................|
The T's are the regular turnouts. The _ / \ and | are track. The X is the crossing. The Y is a wye turnout. The periods are to keep it spaced out.
This is pretty crude, but I hope you can get the idea.
Enjoy
Paul
If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
Reply
IRONROOSTER
Member since
June 2003
From: Culpeper, Va
8,201 posts
Posted by
IRONROOSTER
on Friday, June 11, 2004 11:47 PM
Hmmm got some help from the system, let's see if I can make this better
_____________________________________
...................................T............T
.....................................\........../
.......................................\....../
.........................................X
...................................../.......\....
.................................../...........\.....
..................................|.............|
...................................\.........../
......................................\ ...../
........................................\ /
.........................................Y
..........................................|
..........................................|
If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
Reply
warner brook
Member since
October 2003
From: mt.jewett,pa
78 posts
Posted by
warner brook
on Saturday, June 12, 2004 5:11 AM
thanks alot[:)] it made sense after i seen it on paper.roy
dutchman
Reply
BR60103
Member since
January 2001
From: Guelph, Ont.
1,476 posts
Posted by
BR60103
on Wednesday, June 16, 2004 11:04 PM
A simple wye, on the side of a straight length of track, will occupy at least twice the radius used -- one radius from turnout A to the wye turnout, then a second radius to turnout B. Off to the side, it will take one radius. For a 24" radius, this makes a space of 24" by 48". Now you need to add tail tracks long enough to take the locomotive of train you're turning. 12" or more for a loco, lots for a train.
--David
Reply
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Users Online
COL BEAUSABRE
see all »
Search the Community
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter
See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter
and get model railroad news in your inbox!
Sign up