Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

my girlfriends mom's N scale

5041 views
24 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2009
  • 10 posts
my girlfriends mom's N scale
Posted by 87_Crown_Vic on Wednesday, March 18, 2009 7:30 AM

my girlfriends mother has a N scale setup i would like to have.  it has a smaller tunnel, waterfall, roundhouse and 2 sheds for it along with other things.  problem with the setup is it wasnt designed to be torn down unless the scenery gets cut.  it is roughly 14 feet long by 3 feet deep. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

hope you guys like the setup and trains and stuff... she has more stuff and i have more pictures.   story behind it is it belonged to my girlfriends mothers boyfriend that passed away.  she inherited the stuff and doesnt use it and keeps it covered all the time with plastic.  the cars and locomotives are in boxes tha fill up under the table the setup is built on.  many of the things were bought at swap meets and new and never even used.  as you can tell by the track it wasnt completed.  thought i would share the lay out with you all...

 

1986 - 1987 Ford Panther platform freak and sponge for knowledge. want to learn more about hobby trains and want a layout to be proud of. it would be more interesting than getting into nitro r/c.
  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Chippewa Falls, WI
  • 267 posts
Posted by MPRR on Wednesday, March 18, 2009 8:29 AM

Very nice.. Bring on more pics.

Mike

Mike Captain in Charge AJP Logging RR
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: In the State of insanity!
  • 7,982 posts
Posted by pcarrell on Wednesday, March 18, 2009 8:31 AM

Great setup, and it looks well done.  Think you could cut it and get it out without causing terminal damage?

Philip
  • Member since
    March 2009
  • 10 posts
Posted by 87_Crown_Vic on Wednesday, March 18, 2009 9:39 AM

the problem about cutting it is the backdrop how it is raised track along the cliff is foam and much of the rest would need cut by razor knife to piece it together again.  girlfriends mom says she has no use for it and would sell to me for $1500.  though i think $1000 would be more reasonable since i would have to get things separated and figure out all the wiring for all the track switches, lighting, and other electrical stuff.   my girlfriend says she wouldnt mind having the setup, but we have no room unless i set it up in basement or in garage.  basement would be too much of a pain since it can get 15 inches of water since we are low area close to Missouri River.  when water table goes up, so does water in basement.  garage would be a good place for the setup since i am sectioning off a side of it that used to be parking stall as a werk area.  just right now, funds arent gonna allow me since my car just had an issue today and looking for a job.  seems things never werk out as planned.  i might end up getting some cars and locomotives and start my own layout with stuff she will sell me.  she is only asking like $5-$10 each piece.  she has lots of stuff that would go with the layout if sold also.  here is a link of all pictures i took of her layout and pieces she has.  there was stuff i didnt have chance to take pictures of, but i can say she has it and no need for it.

http://s48.photobucket.com/albums/f234/Nebraskachickenfarmer/train%20stuff%20for%20sale/

1986 - 1987 Ford Panther platform freak and sponge for knowledge. want to learn more about hobby trains and want a layout to be proud of. it would be more interesting than getting into nitro r/c.
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Sacramento,CA
  • 86 posts
Posted by travon on Wednesday, March 18, 2009 12:19 PM

 87 Crown Vic, one solution for you is to buy the house from your girlfreind mom and layout as is yours. Is this an option for you?

Travon Sacramento Valley RR in 1906, On30 DRG&W in 1890, Polar Express. If we ever forget that were one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.   -  Ronald Reagan
  • Member since
    March 2009
  • 10 posts
Posted by 87_Crown_Vic on Wednesday, March 18, 2009 12:39 PM

my girlfriend would love to buy home from her mom, but it is in a unfriendly type neighborhood in the city.  i myself prefer the country living and girlfriend has grown to living in the country.  last thing we need is our cars getting broke into or stolen and kids getting shot.  the kind of neighborhood that my girlfriend's mother lives in, our cars wouldnt last the nite.  we have the big cars that are preferred.  i have a pair of 1987 2 door Crown Victorias, a 1987 sedan Grand Marquis, girlfriend has a 1989 Crown Victoria, and her son has a car i gave him which is a 1986 converted to 1987 engine setup Grand Marquis.  my girlfriend's mother is behind on taxes and reason why she wants to sell me the layout.  i wouldnt mind the layout to put in my garage since that is my play area, BUT i have been thinking of getting int garden scale. 

1986 - 1987 Ford Panther platform freak and sponge for knowledge. want to learn more about hobby trains and want a layout to be proud of. it would be more interesting than getting into nitro r/c.
  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: good ole WI
  • 1,326 posts
Posted by BerkshireSteam on Wednesday, March 18, 2009 2:17 PM

Oh hooooooooooo the pain. I looked the pics on the link and I would love snatch up at least 90% of the cars and number of the motive power, but alas I would need the lottery to be big and bank I would have to rob have a lot of cash on hand. Ooooooh the torture. And a 2 door vic? That doesn't sound right. I remember my dads '89 Grand Marque. Heh heh heh heh heh heh heh. I still don't think he knows why the rear tires wore out so quickly MischiefMischief. I had the chance to buy it from him but passed. At that point I moved to the 'big city' and didn't want a big car. Instead I bought a new car which got repo'd a year latter because I lost the job I had. Now of course I realized just how cool that ol 'GM' was and wish I would have taken it. Instead it went to a family that had 3 kids all learning how to drive at the same time. Needless to say it was beat up a bit. The needed two cars for the 3 kids so they ended up getting a newer Chrysler and then both boys signed up for the Army and were gone for boot camp and all that so I don't know what happened to the car. As far as I know they sold it off and it's still out there running around. I know it was a Ford, but I still kind of miss that little 5 liter. That was the one nice thing Ford did, they used the same 5.0L as the Mustangs for the larger cars like the Marques and Vics, but never detunned them like GM did. The 5.7's in the Camaro/Firebirds is the same LS1 as in the Corvettes but they detunned them from 345hp down to about 305 in the earlier years and then bumped it up to 315 for the last few years of F-body production. Er, sorry, last few years of the Camaro/Firebird production. In case anyone cares Corvettes were called Y-body's. I'm full of what most people would consider useless information. Just don't run into many people anymore who would enjoy listening to me explain how the transmission from the Viper was changed around to be used in the Camaro/Firebird and how it was then modified to work in the Corvette. For that matter I have yet to run into anyone who even cares about the different gear ratios between the Viper/Camaro/Corvette manual even though they were all the basically the same transmission. Or the performance gear ratios for the Corvette transaxles, which did differe between the auto/manual. Nevermind, I'm babbling off subject again.

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • 177 posts
Posted by steveiow on Wednesday, March 18, 2009 5:15 PM

OK as I see it,you got 5 cars between you?

Sell 4 and buy the models with the proceeds-no problem!

Why would you want 5 cars anyway,must cost a bomb to run them even with the cheap gas you get in the statesWink

Steve

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • From: Memphis, TN
  • 3,876 posts
Posted by Packers#1 on Wednesday, March 18, 2009 7:56 PM

 Looks like a nice model railroad, and plenty of trains for it as well! Big Smile

Sawyer Berry

Clemson University c/o 2018

Building a protolanced industrial park layout

 

  • Member since
    August 2008
  • From: Charlotte NC
  • 314 posts
Posted by aflyer on Wednesday, March 18, 2009 8:42 PM

I say buy the layout with whatever cash you can raise, beg or borrow. 

Can you pass the layout out of the house through a window to get it out in one piece??  No problem moving it into your garage in one piece. 

Good luck with it, it is a great layout!!

George

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Prescott, AZ
  • 1,736 posts
Posted by Midnight Railroader on Wednesday, March 18, 2009 8:58 PM

87_Crown_Vic
girlfriends mom says she has no use for it and would sell to me for $1500. 

 

Experience tells me she will never get $1,500, or $1,000 for it.

She may get the value of the locos and rolling stock, if she's lucky.

Just wait until she finds out it won't sell and then offer to take it off her hands for nothing.

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • 745 posts
Posted by HarryHotspur on Thursday, March 19, 2009 12:10 AM

MILW-RODR -

I actually find that info sort of interesting. From my younger days (1960s) I remember the Chevy close ratio 4-speed was a much sweeter shifting tranny than the wide ratio version. But tell me this: Lately I've noticed the 1987 +/- Crown Vic has had a resurgence in popularity. But why? They were okay cars (as long as you didn't mind planning far ahead to turn a corner), but nothing special that I could see. What's the appeal?

- Harry

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: WSOR Northern Div.
  • 1,559 posts
Posted by WSOR 3801 on Thursday, March 19, 2009 10:09 AM

HarryHotspur
But tell me this: Lately I've noticed the 1987 +/- Crown Vic has had a resurgence in popularity. But why? They were okay cars (as long as you didn't mind planning far ahead to turn a corner), but nothing special that I could see. What's the appeal?

 

They are actual cars, with frames, room inside, voluminous trunks, and rear wheel drive, which holds up better, can be used for towing, etc.  Fairly easy to work on.  Could have cop tires, cop brakes, cop suspension. I had '86, '88, & '90 Crown Vics.  Now I could put collector plates on the older ones, if I still had them.Sad  The newest ones are built on nearly the same frame. The Crown Vic and Mustang and truck 302s are all different.  A Mustang 302 could be placed in a Vic, but the computer would need some upgrades.  The camshaft out of a truck is a nice upgrade for a Vic. 

2-doors lasted until the '88 body style change.  Wagons ended in '91.  The wagons would hold 4x8 sheets of material.  Wish I could have found one...  

Mike WSOR engineer | HO scale since 1988 | Visit our club www.WCGandyDancers.com

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: Dayton, OH
  • 124 posts
Posted by nw_fan on Thursday, March 19, 2009 10:33 AM
 You could buy a lot of new track and new trains with $1000-1500.
This layout is a but dated in its design and operating potential.
The engines would be nice to have, though.
Precision Transportation
  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: good ole WI
  • 1,326 posts
Posted by BerkshireSteam on Thursday, March 19, 2009 1:32 PM

I just said the engine. Obviously a low torque engine from a 3000lb sports car isn't going to do as great for a 4000lb family sedan. And the only thing special about cop car tires is they use H-rated tires, and that's only a modern thing. Back in the old days what seperated your car from the cops car was the paint job and the flashy lights. Starting in the 80's is when they started to make them different, and even it isn't much. What makes a last generation Crown Vic cop car different from your grandpa's 2000 crowny? Besides the obvious, the H-rate tires, slightly different electronics to make all the lights flash, the addition of a power steering cooler, and a heavy-duty transcooler, which if I remember right wasn't anything special itself, it was just a transcooler from a truck instead of a car. As for the resurgance, with the gas prices the way they are going up and down all the time I couldn't tell you why. Their is a kind of dumb trend going through the auto world right that takes older full size cars and modys them to fit typically 22-26 inch truck tires/wheels, but they people who do that (I won't say because then I will be called racist and I'm not) usually stick with older cars, like late 70's to late 80's. LTD's, Capris's, Impala's, Cutlass', Regals', Monte Carlo's, cars like that. I will have to admit I suckered into this trend a tad and modified a 1/18 die cast '55 Chevy to fit a whomping sound system with a trunk full of speakers, usuall dozen speakers in the cab and a few monitors, and added a set of 30 inch truck wheels/tires. I didn't mess with the plastic suspenion height so it would be stock height which made it look better. Ever seen a '70 Cutlass 4-4-2 convertible jacked up 6 inches in the air and waring 24 inch wheels? It looks pretty stupid, eeeespecially with a '70 4-4-2 rag top. I also bought a 1/25 Monte that could be made in the style, but it ended up getting stepped on and the roof crushed in so now when I get around to it I plan using the '57 chevy custom dragster kit to kitbash with it and make an '87 Monte Carlo topless drag car. It should look pretty neat. I had a Chevy truck model (67 I think) that I got sick of having around so I built it but didn't have any paint so now I have a Chevy lowrider truck that's 90% molded plastic white with a few chrome accents and some gold spoke wheels. I left the hood off to show the chrome accents which all happened to be under hood, and I call it the "Ghost". I should get some pics of it to show off, but right now it's sort of relegated to a shop truck with a scale 1/25 Corvette 327 motor in the back and a set of big inch rims/tires. Hmmm, maybe I should dable into diorama's with this truck.

And not too many people now a says buy a car because it's rear wheel drive. It seems most people are split between FWD for snowy area's or they're an idiot and go buy a Tahoe with 4WD thinking that will save them from spinning when they hit black ice. People an keep thinking that though, it does give me quite a laugh.

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Prescott, AZ
  • 1,736 posts
Posted by Midnight Railroader on Thursday, March 19, 2009 1:37 PM

MILW-RODR

I just said the engine. Obviously a low torque engine from a 3000lb sports car isn't going to do as great for a 4000lb family sedan. And the only thing special about cop car tires is they use H-rated tires, and that's only a modern thing. Back in the old days what seperated your car from the cops car was the paint job and the flashy lights. Starting in the 80's is when they started to make them different, and even it isn't much. What makes a last generation Crown Vic cop car different from your grandpa's 2000 crowny? Besides the obvious, the H-rate tires, slightly different electronics to make all the lights flash, the addition of a power steering cooler, and a heavy-duty transcooler, which if I remember right wasn't anything special itself, it was just a transcooler from a truck instead of a car. As for the resurgance, with the gas prices the way they are going up and down all the time I couldn't tell you why. Their is a kind of dumb trend going through the auto world right that takes older full size cars and modys them to fit typically 22-26 inch truck tires/wheels, but they people who do that (I won't say because then I will be called racist and I'm not) usually stick with older cars, like late 70's to late 80's. LTD's, Capris's, Impala's, Cutlass', Regals', Monte Carlo's, cars like that. I will have to admit I suckered into this trend a tad and modified a 1/18 die cast '55 Chevy to fit a whomping sound system with a trunk full of speakers, usuall dozen speakers in the cab and a few monitors, and added a set of 30 inch truck wheels/tires. I didn't mess with the plastic suspenion height so it would be stock height which made it look better. Ever seen a '70 Cutlass 4-4-2 convertible jacked up 6 inches in the air and waring 24 inch wheels? It looks pretty stupid, eeeespecially with a '70 4-4-2 rag top. I also bought a 1/25 Monte that could be made in the style, but it ended up getting stepped on and the roof crushed in so now when I get around to it I plan using the '57 chevy custom dragster kit to kitbash with it and make an '87 Monte Carlo topless drag car. It should look pretty neat. I had a Chevy truck model (67 I think) that I got sick of having around so I built it but didn't have any paint so now I have a Chevy lowrider truck that's 90% molded plastic white with a few chrome accents and some gold spoke wheels. I left the hood off to show the chrome accents which all happened to be under hood, and I call it the "Ghost". I should get some pics of it to show off, but right now it's sort of relegated to a shop truck with a scale 1/25 Corvette 327 motor in the back and a set of big inch rims/tires. Hmmm, maybe I should dable into diorama's with this truck.

And not too many people now a says buy a car because it's rear wheel drive. It seems most people are split between FWD for snowy area's or they're an idiot and go buy a Tahoe with 4WD thinking that will save them from spinning when they hit black ice. People an keep thinking that though, it does give me quite a laugh.

 

This is a model railroading topic in what way?

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: good ole WI
  • 1,326 posts
Posted by BerkshireSteam on Thursday, March 19, 2009 1:59 PM

Because Crown Vics may have been hauled around on RR auto cars, the "Ghost" could easily be given to someone who models in large scale for a scene, and someone asked me a question in a previous post, I had to answer. Still don't think it relates? How about this:

I model in N scale so it would be more difficult, easier in larger scales, but if you get a hold of the '78 Ford Fairmont that is usually scene for RR model vehicles it could fairly easily modeled to took like the older LTD/Crown Victories. If you model in the 80's a new nose might have to crafted and grafted on, but the body would be similar. After all this talk I think it would be neat to see someone model a Crowny. It could be placed in the employee parking lot of your yard Packer dude. Maybe even paint on like a Packer bumper sticker, make them a Packer fan. On at least one of my locos I plan having it painted in a special Green and Gold paint scheme. Maybe check to see if it is in a time era when Packers were celebrating an anniversary.

And now back to the 'non' related post, I did forget to mention in my last post that the Packers were always Acme Packers. They weren't around when it was called India Packers. If I remember right the team started to form when it was still India, but wasn't famous or Pro untill after India Packers was sold and renamed Acme Packers. This was all way back in early 1900's though. 60-70 years before my time.

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: NYC
  • 551 posts
Posted by corsair7 on Thursday, March 19, 2009 2:29 PM

I model in N-Scale too but I haven't gotten around to vehicles for the layout yet other than some N-Scale school busses. I do current era modeling some anything before 1980 wouldn't be common on the layout except for junkers. To bad there aren't alot of prototype N-Scale versions of these cars you are talking about. I personally would love to see an N-Scale version of my 2007 Impala on the layoyt but they don't make any as far as I know.

I only drove one Ford in my life. My father had a 1959 Ford Galaxie that I drove for a while and then got stolen. It was nice car but i didn't like it that much since it was hardtop. That was replaced by 1963 Pontiac Grand Prix which I loved to drive.That one didn't have air conditioning but boy was it built.

Irv

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: On the Banks of the Great Choptank
  • 2,916 posts
Posted by wm3798 on Friday, March 20, 2009 10:24 AM

 The layout's only 14' long?  Just put it in the back seat of the Crown Vic!Big Smile

 Honestly, what I would do is offer her the $1,000, then strip the layout and rebuild it at your house.  If it's been sitting for a long time, odds are it has problems cropping up from years of dirt, corrosion, expansion/contraction etc.

I would remove all the track, then carefully cut the table into at least two sections.

If you really like the track plan, you could simply re-assemble it as it is, then carefully relay the track, or replace it with something better like Atlas Code 55.  You would also have the opportunity to correct any track plan problems it might have by changing a grade or an alignment, or by replacing the old Atlas bridges with something a little more realistic.

Or, it's possible that you don't have room to set it back up as is, and will have to reconfigure the layout to fit your space.  In that case, just strip it all the way down to components, and start from scratch.  Foam is foam, it can be cut and re worked, and you can probably build a new improved layout having to purchase only some cork roadbed, recycling everying else.

Don't end up handcuffing yourself to somebody else's plan.  An old carpenter once told me "If someone put it together, someone else can take it apart!"

Good luck with that...

Lee

Route of the Alpha Jets  www.wmrywesternlines.net

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Prescott, AZ
  • 1,736 posts
Posted by Midnight Railroader on Friday, March 20, 2009 10:32 AM

 

wm3798

I would remove all the track, then carefully cut the table into at least two sections.

If you really like the track plan, you could simply re-assemble it as it is, then carefully relay the track, or replace it with something better like Atlas Code 55.  You would also have the opportunity to correct any track plan problems it might have by changing a grade or an alignment, or by replacing the old Atlas bridges with something a little more realistic.

Or, it's possible that you don't have room to set it back up as is, and will have to reconfigure the layout to fit your space.  In that case, just strip it all the way down to components, and start from scratch.  Foam is foam, it can be cut and re worked, and you can probably build a new improved layout having to purchase only some cork roadbed, recycling everying else.

Don't end up handcuffing yourself to somebody else's plan.  An old carpenter once told me "If someone put it together, someone else can take it apart!"

 

 Then there's little point in paying $1,000 for used layout materials, especially older stuff like what's pictured. You could get new and better track, for example, with that same money.

  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by Hamltnblue on Friday, March 20, 2009 3:28 PM
You do have another option. Marry the mother so you can update and run the layout where it stands.

Springfield PA

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: good ole WI
  • 1,326 posts
Posted by BerkshireSteam on Friday, March 20, 2009 3:35 PM

Hamltnblue
You do have another option. Marry the mother so you can update and run the layout where it stands.

 

LOLOLOL. That is the best answer given yet Happy B-Day

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • 177 posts
Posted by steveiow on Friday, March 20, 2009 3:36 PM

Hamltnblue
You do have another option. Marry the mother so you can update and run the layout where it stands.

Ahh...but then he'd have to sell all 5 carsWink

Steve

  • Member since
    February 2009
  • 47 posts
Posted by kddigger on Tuesday, March 31, 2009 10:27 PM

 While looking at the pictures of the under side as well as the top you can divide it up in 3 sections, put line up marks on the wood under it and then cut and split the set up with removal of very little track. as for the wires mark then with maskin tape and put numbers on them and clip them. the only thing you might have to spend time doing is touch up work on the scenery. doing wood work for as many yeads as i have i dont see the problem in moving it.

  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: THE FAR, FAR REACHES OF THE WILD, WILD WEST!
  • 3,672 posts
Posted by R. T. POTEET on Wednesday, April 1, 2009 1:33 PM

I take it that you either want to or have to move this.Okay. Please, don't tell me that this layout is located in a basement and you live in a third-floor apartment!

It appears that this layout butts up against a wall so the first thing you're gonna have to do is saw it away from the wall; if this platform is joined to the wall framework you might just as well stop reading right here and exercise the good old principle of "GIVE UP" because you are asking for trouble. This, of course, is going to depend upon just how it is attached to the wall. Assuming that it can be freed from the wall then the next problem is going to be getting it out of the structure.

Most hallways and stairways--like up out of a basement--are built to a width of 40-44 inches however architects have a perverted penchant for butting stairways against a wall and 14 feet is just a little long to get around a corner. Three feet is just a mite wide for standard door width--32 inches--but there may be an arcadia door or the like that would allow it to be taken out onto a patio. If that is not an alternative then consider popping a window and using three men and a boy you could probably take it outside and into a truck or trailer in that way.

Then there is the matter of getting it into its new structure which could present a problem in and of itself.

From the far, far reaches of the wild, wild west I am: rtpoteet

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!