Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Question

1241 views
5 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Question
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, March 26, 2004 11:05 PM
I am getting ready to create my first layout and wanted to what brand or code of track would be to be the to use. The layout will be built in modules 2' wide and approx 3' long. Any suggestions would greatly appreciated.

Gman
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Metro East St. Louis
  • 5,743 posts
Posted by simon1966 on Friday, March 26, 2004 11:24 PM
I have just had to make the same decision and have now laid about 200ft of track in my first layout project in many years. I think the decision should be based on many factors. What you want to run, how realistic do you want the track to look, what control system you plan to use, and how much do you want to spend. Perhaps local avaialbility is also important. For me, I plan to run both US HO and UK OO scale. Code 100 was the obvious choice to eliminate problems with the flanges on my older UK stuff. I chose Atlas flex track, combined with PECO turnouts. Atlas track has proven to be good to work with and relatively inexpensive. I am less concered about the prototypical look as I am the desire to run a mixture of rolling stock. Do a quick search of the archives on turnout selection and PECO, will come up time and time again. They cost more than some, but asside from some frog issues, I have been really pleased with the quality of them. I am using insulforgs as I plan to get DCC up and running in the near future. Of great importance to me, both Atlas and Peco are available at very competetive prices at my local hobby shop just down the street. (If anyone if from the Metro East of St. Louis, go to K-10 in Maryville amazing place). It might be helpful to list your own criteria and see what suggestions you get. Have fun, I sure am.

Simon

Simon Modelling CB&Q and Wabash See my slowly evolving layout on my picturetrail site http://www.picturetrail.com/simontrains and our videos at http://www.youtube.com/user/MrCrispybake?feature=mhum

  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: US
  • 506 posts
Posted by snowey on Saturday, March 27, 2004 12:18 AM
what scale are you modeling? Tell us that, and someone here can answer your question.
"I have a message...Lt. Col....Henry Blakes plane...was shot down...over the Sea Of Japan...it spun in...there were no survivors".
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, March 27, 2004 11:08 AM
It will be HO scale. I plan it to be modeled after a real railroad in the deisel era. i have been doing my homework by reading every magazine plus i have several old track plan books and others. I was just curious as to what people find the most reliable track type is to lay.
  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: US
  • 506 posts
Posted by snowey on Saturday, March 27, 2004 2:39 PM
I'm not in HO anymore; I was but an unexpected move forced me to switch to N scale. But I can still answer your questions. In HO, if you want the track to look more realistic the best size rail is Code 83 or 70. The best track brands are Shinohara (Walthers), Atlas, Peco, and Kato "Uni-Track".
"I have a message...Lt. Col....Henry Blakes plane...was shot down...over the Sea Of Japan...it spun in...there were no survivors".
  • Member since
    October 2009
  • 129 posts
Posted by CP5170 on Saturday, March 27, 2004 3:32 PM
Gman: From My experience, select the turnout that you want to use and then select the track. For example, I started with Shinohara turnouts in code 83 because I thought that it was more prototypical. Subsequently, I used Peco turnouts in code 100 for my hidden staging areas. If I was to do it over, I would use code 100 because I like the Peco turnouts and after ballasting not many people can tell the difference. Also code 100 seems to be the most popular and therefore available everywhere and more resonable priced.

Hope this helps...Ken

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!