Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Red Rock Northern progress?

6752 views
4 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2008
  • From: Arizona
  • 1 posts
Red Rock Northern progress?
Posted by ken10 on Wednesday, August 13, 2008 7:17 PM

I,too, decided to build in HO the Red Rock Northern (Jerry Boudreaux, designer), but have just learned there is a big difference between seeing the diagram in MR and being able to re-create it in RTS or Xtrk.

 The last layout I built was many years ago: John Armstrong's Berkshire Valley Route. With that, I had the advantage of the excellent step-by-step plans and narrative from Atlas' King Size Plan Book.

So far, I have come up with a track plan on RTS, but in order for me to get it to look anything like the Red Rock Northern, I can see myself working hard but getting nowhere for months! As much as I like learning new software, I do want to get beyond the design stage in a reasonable amount of time. Without having specific information on curve radii, turnout numbers,elevations, etc., I can see myself in an endless process of guessing at different combinations. 

 I am not yet frustrated, but unless I see some light at the end of the tunnel .......

Sure would like to get your advice.

 

 

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • 569 posts
Posted by ratled on Wednesday, August 13, 2008 8:49 PM

Ken -

Here are some links to the past Red Rock and Northern posts.  It's not all but the ones I could find quickly.  The Red Rock and Northern has to be one of the most talked about MR layouts there is - I might be just a little bias on this though.

http://cs.trains.com/forums/1369081/ShowPost.aspx

http://cs.trains.com/forums/1323478/ShowPost.aspx

http://cs.trains.com/forums/1496627/ShowPost.aspx

In one of these Jerry has provided some info to help out figuring it out.  Let me know if you need more.  I gave up on trying to put into a CAD.  I would rather just build it.

 I have decided to eliminate the mines loop in the original plan.  I had post about this here.

http://cs.trains.com/forums/1436707/ShowPost.aspx

I was thinking what tomikawaTT said but I knew it was only going to look good on paper and I wound up with too much hidden trackage.


Drop me an e mail with your e mail address and I'll send you a few things I just sent out the other day.  I also JUST posted some pictures here if anyone wants to see'em.

http://s90.photobucket.com/albums/k256/ratled/Klamath%20Line/

Here is what the current plan is today. You can still see the RR&N bones in it but has become it's own plan now.   Remember this is a concept plan only.  It will serve as guide as I lay track.    I know the yard needs work 

I know there were several others working on this - any progress.

THANKS TO EVERYONE WHO HELPED ME GET THIS FAR!!!!!!

ratled

 

Modeling the Klamath River area in HO on a proto-lanced sub of the SP “The State of Jefferson Line”

  • Member since
    October 2005
  • From: Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
  • 352 posts
Posted by WaxonWaxov on Thursday, August 14, 2008 10:01 AM

Sorry... what does RTS stand for?

 

  • Member since
    January 2008
  • From: Big Blackfoot River
  • 2,788 posts
Posted by Geared Steam on Thursday, August 14, 2008 10:34 AM

It is Atlas Right Track Software, and is used to create a trackplan on a computer, it's free but the templates are based on Atlas track only. (Not a bad thing)

http://www.atlasrr.com/righttrack.htm

 

 

"The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination."-Albert Einstein

http://gearedsteam.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    August 2008
  • 38 posts
Posted by deckroid on Sunday, August 24, 2008 3:58 PM

Thanks for the links.

 I have been working on this off and on since I got June 07 in the mail.  I finally tore down my old layout in April and have been slowly working in earnest. I am just about ready to lay track down now. I modified the original plans a bit, but not to the extent that you did. Wow, nice work.

 Did anyone but me notice that with a 90' TT in that location, things get a bit cramped?  I had to move the TT over a bit and add an angle piece in there just to get it all to fit.  I don't like to have my rails run so dang close to the edge. Not so much a safty issue, but rather an effect thing. I like to have 2 or 3 inches between the locos and the scenery. That way, it looks more... I don't know... real?  I can have a row or two of trees before the hardtack boards with painted scenery on them. Just a personal preference...

I didnt use CAD or RTS... I just put together a 9x11 L-Girder, made it all 24", glued my blue foam down, then used my kids butcher paper to freehand the plans.  I built a little jig to draw the curves, which I expanded, and it all worked out great.  I needed larger curves for my passenger cars and also straightened, to some degree, the portion with the wooden tressle bridge.

 I really like this layout.  With a double loop and some side lines for industries, I figure I can have a buddy or two over to run and we can have a swell time.

Thanks again for all the leg work on getting these links. 

 George

 

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!