Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

designing turning wye

9503 views
17 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Ogden UT.
  • 65 posts
designing turning wye
Posted by L Cowan on Saturday, December 8, 2007 8:42 PM
i have looked through the forum and found a drawing of a single scissors wye but would like to see drawings of double turning wyes and triple. i am designing a 5' X 10' logging layout and would like to use turning wyes if possible in the limited space available. and yes the design will be posted for comments when i get it done.
Never to old for trains!! Lee
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Saturday, December 8, 2007 11:25 PM

I wish I could help, but all I see when I try to visualize what I think you mean is a Gordian Knot of track that will have to occupy a huge footprint in the centre of your layout space.

Can you provide a rough schematic of what a double and triple turning wye should look like?

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Ogden UT.
  • 65 posts
Posted by L Cowan on Sunday, December 9, 2007 12:39 AM

here is a diagram of the only scissors wye i can find, there should be others but i can't visualize them

Never to old for trains!! Lee
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Sunday, December 9, 2007 1:33 AM
Yes, I am familiar with that type, and with the regular turning wye which still has the three turnouts, but no scissoring, just a wye turnout at the tail of the turning wye, just like the one in your diagram.  I have never heard of a double or triple wye, though.  So, I am stuck, and can only hope, like you, that someone figures it out or knows exactly what you mean and where to find diagrams.
  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: Northeast
  • 746 posts
Posted by GraniteRailroader on Sunday, December 9, 2007 3:38 AM

I think he means a second wye inside of the first.

The only way I can see to accomplish it would be with six "wye" turnouts and a minimum of two double slips. Banged Head [banghead]

This space reserved for SpaceMouse's future presidential candidacy advertisements

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: In the State of insanity!
  • 7,982 posts
Posted by pcarrell on Sunday, December 9, 2007 8:37 AM

The scissors wye only really is smaller in one dimention. The top isn't as thick.  It sacrifices that thickness for added length though. The other two legs are pretty much normal.  It's a very specialized piece of trackwork that wasn't real common, though not unheard of.  It was most often seen in mountainous areas where space was limited by some natural obstruction.  I've seen it used in cities too for the same reasons.

The only double or triple wyes I know of actually occupy more space then a conventional wye because of aded trackage making them thicker in all dimentions.  The ones I've seen don't use slip switches but instead use regular diamonds, so they really aren't any more useful then a regular wye.  The only uses I've seen them for are multi-track wyes where each track has it's own wye, they just happen to overlap.

Maybe I'm not understanding the question though..............

Philip
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • 627 posts
Posted by exPalaceDog on Sunday, December 9, 2007 9:36 AM

There are a couple of wye designs in the following collection of "modules".

Perhaps one will give you some ideas.

http://i197.photobucket.com/albums/aa266/exPalaceDog/A0-AAAA-5-1.jpg

 

Have fun

 

 

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Central Vermont
  • 4,565 posts
Posted by cowman on Wednesday, December 12, 2007 10:06 PM

I have an old Atlas book, "Atlas Custom Line Layouts For HO Scale Railroads," 2nd edition.  In the back it has six different single track wyes and one double track.  The double track uses 2 wyes, two left and two right #4 turnouts, 22"r track.  It is 70" long, doesn't say how wide, about 36" if I measured right. 

I would think that a newer Atlas book would have a similar section in it, shows many types of ladders, crossovers and track transitions as well as the wyes.

Have fun,

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Thursday, December 13, 2007 12:37 AM

For the tracklaying masochists among us, the St. Louis Union Terminal had TWO triple-track wyes that overlapped each other and spread out into a huge fan of back-in platform tracks.  I haven't found a plan for that - but, then, I haven't looked.

I suspect that the station and the wyes would pretty well fill a two-car garage - without any additional track to support it!

Chuck (modeling Central Japan in September, 1964 - without wyes)

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Bronx, NY
  • 381 posts
Posted by Hudson on Thursday, December 13, 2007 12:55 AM
I have pictures of that.......It's a humongous, yet elegant piece of trackwork!
  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Teaneck, New Jersey
  • 136 posts
Posted by rxanand on Thursday, December 13, 2007 5:17 AM
I found another example of a folded wye on a different board board. Looks fascinating!

Slowly building a layout since 2007!

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Teaneck, New Jersey
  • 136 posts
Posted by rxanand on Thursday, December 13, 2007 6:05 AM
And if you want to see something really amazing, take a look at the turning pentacle ! The text is German but the pictures make the concept clear.

Slowly building a layout since 2007!

  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: Colorado
  • 4,075 posts
Posted by fwright on Thursday, December 13, 2007 10:47 AM

 rxanand wrote:
And if you want to see something really amazing, take a look at the turning pentacle ! The text is German but the pictures make the concept clear.

Thanks for the incredible idea and link.  I just may use it where I was struggling to find space for the wye tail.

Fred W 

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Ogden UT.
  • 65 posts
Posted by L Cowan on Thursday, December 13, 2007 11:29 AM

Thank you for all the good info. i am not sure what i will do but when i get the design together i will put it up for dismemberment. love this forum and check it daily, don't say much but read a lot.

again thanks for the help

Never to old for trains!! Lee
  • Member since
    November 2007
  • From: auburn,in
  • 113 posts
Posted by wheeler on Friday, December 14, 2007 12:13 AM
LOVE the turning pentacle! Now, just "where" to put one!Laugh [(-D]
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: CANADA
  • 2,292 posts
Posted by ereimer on Friday, December 14, 2007 9:23 AM

while we're on the subject of wye's , what is the minimum space that an HO wye will take ? i'm wondering if i have room for one to turn small steam engines , say anything that would fit a 90' turntable .

thanks in advance 

 

ernie 

  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: Colorado
  • 4,075 posts
Posted by fwright on Friday, December 14, 2007 11:25 AM

A 90ft turntable handles some medium size steam pretty handily (4-6-4, 2-8-4, etc).  More important to the size of your wye is the minimum radius.  The 90ft dimension sets the minimum length of tail tracks.  Also, a big impact is the size and type of turnouts you are using.  Wye turnouts will take the least space because they inject curvature into 2-3 sides of the wye.  Constant radius turnouts will take less space than the more prototypical straight frog (numbered frog) variety.  Straight track after the frog - built into most commercial turnouts - will add to space requirements.  When designing a wye, you can trade off one dimension for the other by where you locate the curves.

For example, a wye where the base is straight:  assuming constant radius turnouts, the base of the wye is going to be twice the curve radius long over the switch points.  From the base to the points on the tail is going to be one times the curve radius.  Note that to get all constant radius turnouts, you are probably going to have to hand lay them (there may be some Peco turnouts, including a wye, that have constant radius throughout). 

By inserting 60 degrees of curve into the base of the wye - including the diverging angle of the turnouts, you arrive at the most compact arrangement overall.  Each leg has a total of 60 degrees of curvature, including turnouts.  Each side would be on the order of 90% of the curve radius, again assuming cosntant radius turnouts.  You need to add space for straight frog turnouts, and any other straight track within the wye itself.

Perhaps the best way to design a wye for your stituation is to draw a few in your favorite track planning software.  Assuming the correct turnout libraries, it will give you the real size with your chosen curve radius, turnouts, tail track length, and curve configuration.

my thoughts, your choices

Fred W 

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • 255 posts
Posted by ranchero on Friday, December 14, 2007 11:27 AM
i think 24 by 30 is what atlas wye will need for a basic wye w/ 18" curves you could probably squeeze it if u use 15" curve or use peco turnout which are a lot more compact

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!