Login
or
Register
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Home
»
Model Railroader
»
Forums
»
Layouts and layout building
»
Benchwork, a means to an end, or wasted money?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>I think this discussion has gone places not completely relevant to whether or not the benchwork is sound. If you construct on an open grid or L-girder frame, and provide joists at 16" or so, I don't think the superior structural rigidity of plywood (as compared to foam) is really a factor over these distances.</p><p>This really is an area that is somewhat scale specific, however. (At least where the larger scales are concerned.) I am a firm believer that for all but narrow shelf style layouts, the benchwork should be built robust enough to hold your own weight. Sooner or later you'll have to put your weight on it to do scenery, change light bulbs, etc. I also believe that a little common sense is in order here; 2x6 L-girders are, of course, absurd. If you're in doubt as to your carpentry or structural design abilities, there are plenty of published works available detailing construction techniques for adequate benchwork.</p><p>I think that maybe we're not seeing the forest through the trees. Ever examine the construction of an aquarium stand? They're made of 1x lumber, usually Oak or Pine, but also even Particle Board. In addition, they're often only stapled together. Now seawater weighs 8-1/2 lbs/gal, so imagine what even a 50-gallon tank weighs with sand, gravel, rocks, etc.</p><p>My point is that it's not necessarily the gauge, or even the structural integrity of the materials we use, but how we use them that counts when constructing a solid foundation.</p><p>As to the use of foam:</p><p>[quote user="orsonroy"]</p><p>It's a sort of copout to use all this great foam base material roughed into almost the proper profile, and then slap on some plaster. <font color="#ff0000">Why not just save the time and expense that goes into the plaster</font> and instead keep carving the foam until it's right?</p><p>[/quote]</p><p>Or... you could save the expense that goes into the foam...</p><p>I can completely see where foam has disticent advantages when modeling flat areas and it's ease of achieving sub-track level terrain. I don't however see any advantage to using it to build up massive areas for hills, mountains, etc. (Except for tree planting.) It seems cost prohibitive, especially if you're going to go over it with plaster/sculptamold anyway. (Newspaper, cardboard strips, etc. are virtually free, why spend the money on foam...)</p><p>About the only other consideration would be the noise...</p><p> </p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Users Online
There are no community member online
Search the Community
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter
See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter
and get model railroad news in your inbox!
Sign up