Trains.com

Nobody said it was THAT big!

1740 views
9 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Nobody said it was THAT big!
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, April 3, 2005 8:29 PM
Hello everybody,

My Heritage 2-6-2 tender loco arrived this morning and I feverishly unpacked it before I left for work. I should've been forewarned because it was a pretty big box, but I knew how big 1:20.3/16mm was didn't I? I had a half built Barclay saddletank on the shelf in my workshop, - and I'd built a few Welsh narrow gauge vehicles for a friend. I'd had that Echo trainset too. Most probably there was just plenty of packing in the box .........



Crikey! - I hauled out this great lump all bound up with bubblewrap and after a bit of tape cutting I found it was just the locomotive, - the blinking tender was still in there somewhere! The tender had to be the slightly smaller bubblewrap lump still in the box, so I lifted that out too and unwrapped it as well.
Bloody hell! - I couldn't believe it, - I had this huge locomotive and tender sitting on my bed all shiny diecast copper plated boiler and all. Suddenly the all the '0' gauge locos on the 1/2 built layout in my bedroom looked like 'N' gauge. If I'd had any 'N' gauge it would've just plain completely disappeared from sight. Wow, - so this was 'G' 1:20.3 scale, WOW!
As I sat and studied my wonderful new loco I was a little disapointed to notice that the pilot/cowcatcher had been cracked through in transit, that the boiler handrail posts on one side were broken and the shunter's footboard on the rear of the tender was cracked through as well. Well it had come to me in a cardboard box thousands of miles across the known world, so I guess I should be grateful nothing else was damaged (sigh). I found myself thinking, 'I can make another pilot from either wood or brass. I'm sure I can turn up some better handrail posts on the lathe that'll be better than those cruddy plastic things. That shunter's footboard would be better made from brass with some wood veneer on the visible surfaces .......'
Crikey! - I was starting to think like a 'G' scaler! There must've been some kind of infectious viral spores or something in the box ........ Then I realised that it was the physical presence of the loco itself right there before my eyes. The parallel cast boiler was great, most of the later Baldwins that worked in New Zealand had the same kind of boiler. In fact I was dead sure the old Wellington & Manawatu Rly had a Baldwin 2-6-2.
Most of the detail castings were acceptable if a bit plain, the smoke stake was a bit naff and plasticy, but it wouldn't be hard to make a new one to the NZGR pattern from sheet metal. Actually if I was going to do that, then a boiler tube***steel plate pilot like the NZGR commonly used in the 1920's would be just perfect. A lot of the gaudy bright work and the overdone red/green colour scheme was going to have to go though. I had ordered a black loco originally, but I ended up having to take this one that looked a wee bit too much like a Christmas tree loco for my taste. Shame the copper finished boiler looks soooooo nice though ......
I don't know if anybody else has purchased a Heritage/Buddy L loco, but I'm hoping that this Chinese made loco will prove to be reliable enough. Strange though it has electrical pickup from the track AND it has a battery compartment in the tender to carry the usual load of 'C' cells (I'm not talking about the sound batteries by the way) Wheels are nice, plated diecast and all that. The siderods seem to be plastic, but are well shaped and detailed and seem to be strong enough for the job. I'm not intending to run long trains anyway, so I think all will be well despite the need for the odd significant grade to get the track layout I want.
I think there needs to be a warning on the boxes 'G' scale stuff comes in though, - something like, 'BEWARE 'G' SCALE LOCOMOTIVE. HIGHLY ADDICTIVE' .

Annie
  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 1,264 posts
Posted by bman36 on Sunday, April 3, 2005 10:16 PM
Hey there,
Congradulations! I had the same reaction with my first train too. You simply gotta' love just how big all this stuff is! Enjoy. Later eh...Brian.
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Virginia Beach
  • 2,150 posts
Posted by tangerine-jack on Sunday, April 3, 2005 11:12 PM
Welcome to the world of "HEFT". Yes, G scale has real physics to back it up, you know, things like gravity- if your loco hits your foot in a fall, then it will hurt for real. That is something you simply don't get in a smaller scale.

BTW, there is no cure for this outdoor addiction!



[oX)]

The Dixie D Short Line "Lux Lucet In Tenebris Nihil Igitur Mors Est Ad Nos 2001"

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Sunday, April 3, 2005 11:38 PM
Annie welcome to LARGE scale[;)]

Most of your other stuff is closer to 1/32 scale, so the move to 1/20.3 is a BIG bump!

Always remember "Bigger Is Better"[8D]

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: The great state of Texas
  • 1,084 posts
Posted by TurboOne on Monday, April 4, 2005 11:43 AM
Awesome engine Annie. Looks great. When are you going to run it ?

Tim
WWJD
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, April 4, 2005 11:49 AM
I think that G scale has mor ein common with real life railroads than with some of the smaller scales. Let me just say that you will have a great time.

I have consider these Buddy-L locomotives for my line. Anyone, ould this be a wise purchase? It would have to be relettered.

Comments?
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: North of Chicago
  • 1,050 posts
Posted by Tom The Brat on Monday, April 4, 2005 12:07 PM
Welcome to large scale![:D]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, April 4, 2005 3:37 PM
I think I'll most probably lay out some track on the floor in the weekend Tim and give No:8 a shake down run. Buying No:8 was a complete punt really, I had no idea what the Heritage locos were like, but with its wheel arrangement, crisply cast metal rather than plastic parallel boiler, the fact that it was a modernised Baldwin-like wood burner with rivetted steel cab and electric headlight, but still with original slide valves, positively shrieked 'logging lokey' at me. In a word I had to have it :-)
In some ways the Heritage locos seem to share some similarity of outline with the Bachman 2-6-0 Mining Moguls which is another loco I have my sights on, - only the coal firing would have to go. In New Zealand logging lokeys always burned slab wood from the sawmill and while I might not be closely or exactly following NZ practice I do want to make sure my lokeys are burning the right fuel!
I actually found out the other day that 'G' folk here in New Zealand who are closely following NZ practice use 1:24 scale which gives them a scale 3ft 6" track gauge, but if I was to go totally for correctly modelling NZ logging in the bush I couldn't have so many lovely small Baldwins. Sooooooo I'm going to stick with 1:20.3 scale for 3ft gauge 'cause it's bigger and I like it :-)

Annie
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, April 4, 2005 7:17 PM
Annie, When I first started this large scale thing i was viewing alot of pics from Vic of saddletank Porters and such...Then I actually saw One WOW! I thought and he always claimed loco "X" was to big for his layout and these Porters are huge!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 5, 2005 1:42 AM
Bigger is not al;ways better. look at Rhode Island.

Rgds Ian

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Garden Railways newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Garden Railways magazine. Please view our privacy policy