Trains.com

newbwee-- how do i calculate % grade

2910 views
16 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2009
  • 10 posts
newbwee-- how do i calculate % grade
Posted by ccrail on Monday, July 20, 2009 4:10 PM

I am planning my fist garden railway and want to know how i calcualte grade. 4% grade means what? is that 4" of rise over 100" of length. thanks for the help

Don CCRail
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: silver spring, md
  • 1,232 posts
Posted by altterrain on Monday, July 20, 2009 4:44 PM

Yes, that's right.  Try to limit yourself to a 2-3% grade. I round off the 100 inches to 8 feet then all you need is an 8 foot 2x4, a level and a tape measure to figure out your grade.

 - Brian

President of
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: North, San Diego Co., CA
  • 3,092 posts
Posted by ttrigg on Monday, July 20, 2009 8:33 PM

CCRAIL

A few "general rules of thumb".

Grades: Try your best to keep the grades below 4% (try harder for 2%). Higher grades mean fewer cars being able to be pulled by any given engine. Higher grades also cause more wear and tear on engines and drive trains, leading to stripped gears.

Curves: Keep your Curves as large as possible 8-10 ft diameter when possible. Tighter curves also limit pulling power, (actually the cars will begin to tip over into the curve is the train is too long. 8 ft. curves will allow you to run most everything out there on the market, with maximum train length. 4~6 ft curves will limit what equipment you will be able to run.

Tunnels: Keep them straight and no longer than you can reach from each end. If you do make them longer, ensure you install access portals.

Rails: Longer rails (5, 8, or 10 ft) make for fewer joints, which makes for better operations. In other words, fewer "picked joints" causing derailments.

Now that I have recited the general rules, as we all know every rule is designed to be broken. You need to know the consequences before violating the rules. I have broken them all.

Grades: I have a "ramp section" for trolley service to the top of my waterfall. Due to constraints as to how much real estate was available and the height I needed to climb I have a 38 foot long section with a 14%~16% grade. I did this knowing I would be replacing gears/street cars a lot more often than should be normal. The only things running on this section are "expendable" streetcars.

Curves: All my mainline curves are 8 ft. Selected locations have a curvature of 6 ft and one location with a 4-ft radius, at the beginning of the streetcar line to the top of the waterfall. Being aware of these limitations, I can still have fun operation.

Tunnels: Mine makes a 90-degree curve, but is still less than reaching distance. This was a concession to the requirement to give the wife her Koi pond at the same time and location as my GRR.

Rails: All my mainline rails are 5-ft sections soldered into 10-ft sections. Like I said above, fewer joints present fewer opportunities of derailments.

Tom Trigg

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Notheast Oho
  • 825 posts
Posted by grandpopswalt on Tuesday, July 21, 2009 12:09 AM

You're right, 4" rise in 100" of travel is a 4% grade.

The formula is R/L=% ...... R=rise, L=length of travel, %=percent of the grade .

So, in your case, 4"rise/100"of length=.04 (.04x100=4%).

Walt

"You get too soon old and too late smart" - Amish origin
  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Oakley Ca
  • 1,407 posts
Posted by dwbeckett on Tuesday, July 21, 2009 7:41 AM

One more thing      Keep your track level side to side. twisted track will cause derailments.

dave

The head is gray, hands don't work , back is weak, legs give out, eyes are gone, money go's and my wife still love's Me.

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: North, San Diego Co., CA
  • 3,092 posts
Posted by ttrigg on Tuesday, July 21, 2009 8:10 PM

dwbeckett
One more thing      Keep your track level side to side. twisted track will cause derailments. dave

I second that motion! A little bit of side to side sway looks realistic for an old dilapidated branch line. If you want the sway then try to stay around 1/32 ~ 1/16 inch difference in rail level. Depending upon your car length and weight anything more than that can cause cars to tip at speed and on curves.

Tom Trigg

  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Oakley Ca
  • 1,407 posts
Posted by dwbeckett on Wednesday, July 22, 2009 8:29 AM

and then..... 1/8 inch per foot equels 1%  so if you only have a 2 foot level and have the need for 3% grade  use a scrape of 1X4 ( 3/4" ) at one end of the level with the other end on the same serface to get your desired grade.

 

Dave 

P.s. I'm Currently using 3/8" spacer in 3ft for 1% grade.................

The head is gray, hands don't work , back is weak, legs give out, eyes are gone, money go's and my wife still love's Me.

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: West Vancouver, BC
  • 39 posts
Posted by steamdonkey on Sunday, August 2, 2009 6:21 PM
Ttrigg passed along some excellent advice. I have one thing to add: Grades on curves: If you can avoid grades on curves completely, your railroad will be more reliable. If you must have grades on curves, restrict them to about half the prevailing grade.
With so many mistakes out there waiting to be made, why bother repeating them?
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: North, San Diego Co., CA
  • 3,092 posts
Posted by ttrigg on Monday, August 3, 2009 7:06 PM

steamdonkey:

Most execelent comment, must add that one to the standard "guidelines" listing.

Tom Trigg

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • 12 posts
Posted by Optisailorusa on Friday, August 21, 2009 5:52 PM

This is my first time building a GR and it is a small start. The layout is about 40 foot total mainline with a switch yard but I am worried about hurting the gears on my engine as I have a section that is about 40 inches long and 3 1/2 inches rise meaning about 8% grade. I run a USA trains GP38-2 with about 5 smaller cars so it goes just fine and I am hoping it wont do to much damage. Any advise on the damage I might be doing to the engine would be great.

Thanks

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: silver spring, md
  • 1,232 posts
Posted by altterrain on Friday, August 21, 2009 7:20 PM

 That's a pretty steep climb and the USAT 2 axle diesel trucks are notorious for splitting the gear hub on the drive axles under a heavy load. Many fix it by wrapping the split hub with thread soaked with CA or replacement gears are readily available.

 -Brian

President of
  • Member since
    July 2009
  • 12 posts
Posted by Optisailorusa on Friday, August 21, 2009 7:32 PM

Where would be the cheapest place to get a replacement and it should not be too bad as it only pulls two boxcars, two little flatcars, and a small tanker right now. I am looking at landscaping it too about a 3% grade.

Thanks

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: silver spring, md
  • 1,232 posts
Posted by altterrain on Saturday, August 22, 2009 1:05 AM

 Regrading sounds like a good idea. The GP38 should be able to handle ~8 cars on a 3% grade.

Order replacement gears directly from Charlie Ro. Contact customer service (best by phone) for ordering info - http://www.charlesro.com/contact_us.htm

-Brian

President of
  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: West Vancouver, BC
  • 39 posts
Posted by steamdonkey on Saturday, August 29, 2009 4:33 PM
I traced my last major derailment to a lack of side-to-side level at a curve. Does anyone have advice for rehabilitating uneven sectional trackwork? I am guessing that there are strains in the trackwork due to actual layout not matching what the sectional track was meant to do. I'll plug away at it and report on progress.
With so many mistakes out there waiting to be made, why bother repeating them?
  • Member since
    September 2006
  • From: Sykesville MD
  • 155 posts
Posted by gbbari on Saturday, August 29, 2009 6:29 PM
Steamdonkey - it would probably help if you described the problems with your trackwork in more detail. What did you mean by "rehabilitating"? The advice given above in this thread is spot on. The method(s) of "rehabilitation" may very depending on how your track is laid. If it is simply laid in ballast on the ground, then that is the easiest to "rehab" by simply taking a bucket of ballast (crusher fines) around with a small scoop and small (3" to 4") paint brush. Also take a nice small level and a long (3 or 4 ft) level.

Use the short level across the rails for side-to-side measure, and use the long level along the rail length to check for humps or dips. Fix everything by pouring on additional ballast, gently lifting the track and and working in gently with the brush. If you have a hump, try gently working the track (use a little pressure and gently side-to-side motion) down into the ballast first, or if that isn't enough. then remove excess ballast until everything is level. Keep measuring across the rails with the short level to avoid creating more problems as you perform your repairs.

Also, it has not been mentioned above that we should avoid short transitions from level track to graded track and vice versa. Make the transition at the bottom and top of every grade as long/gradual as possible. That will help avoid de-coupling and derailment problems.
Al

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: West Vancouver, BC
  • 39 posts
Posted by steamdonkey on Saturday, August 29, 2009 7:15 PM
Excellent advice, gbbari. I nearly added the 'grade transition tip' in my message but deciided a short and focussed message is better. What I've done so far is to tear out a too-long 1*6" bridge and changed the landscape so a two-foot bridge suffices. I do indeed lay my sectional track on crusher-fine ballast and then top-up for a more realistic (i wish) look. I use the supplied aristo/usatrains rail joiners with extra screws. i am just about ready to buy a fistful of rail clamps for the 'problem' joints where the rails don't line up nicely. Part two after replacing the bridge is playing with ballast to level things as best I can. The thing is, I have a feeling the track does not simply lie flat on it's base -- there are some other factors kicking in like torque between track sections, which cause rail to lift and bend.
With so many mistakes out there waiting to be made, why bother repeating them?
  • Member since
    September 2006
  • From: Sykesville MD
  • 155 posts
Posted by gbbari on Sunday, August 30, 2009 9:31 AM
I apologize for partially hijacking ccrail's thread since this really has nothing to do with calculating grades, so I will take this discussion of rehabilitating problem trackwork to a new thread.

AL

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Garden Railways newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Garden Railways magazine. Please view our privacy policy