They don't look real and the detailing is almost non-existant, not to mention there is this extra rail in the middle. We don't use fast clocks and have operating sessions that mimic the real thing. Lord knows we don't have the correct rivets on a 1906 tank car nobody ever heard of. We generally have a big square layout instead of the eye-level walk-around layout, which means we see everything at once.
Why do we like them so much?
That's why we like them.
And besides a lot of us have had those other kinds of layouts and got bored to tears with all the nit picking details when all we really wanted to do was run trains.
jefelectric wrote: That's why we like them. And besides a lot of us have had those other kinds of layouts and got bored to tears with all the nit picking details when all we really wanted to do was run trains.
And that says it all.....................PERIOD !!!!!!!!!!!
Doug Murphy 'We few, we happy few, we band of brothers...' Henry V.
I like and admire all kinds of layouts - big or small, scale or non-scale, detailed or plain. Shoot, I wish I could build 4 or 5 different layouts to cover my own pet likes.I guess when it comes down to it, the only person your layout really has to please is you! If no one else in the world likes it, but you do, then that's just fine.
Good topic !! I guess I'm in the "Anything Goes" crowd !! Still admire any layout someone has !! I couldn't cut the mustard when in HO, but you have to give them a lot of credit for all the knowledge they have & retain. They know a lot of history ! I wish I still had my Lionel 4x8 layout & trains I had as a kid !! Had fun then & I have fun now as it should be, I think !!
Thanks, John
It all boils down to "what floats your boat!"
Ed
FJ and G wrote:OTOH, I admire nicely detailed layouts but I too think it arrogant and unfriendly to hear the rivet counters being critical when I do something that is not their idea of the "standard" way of doing things. On this forum, people seem much much friendlier than on most and people here do pretty much as darn well as they please when it comes to layout building and no one seems to belittle anyone.
cnw1995 wrote:It sure is "fun to run." On the other hand, I greatly admire some of the more detailed layouts in our scale or gauge (how 'bout that NP layout in the latest CTT) and am in awe of some of the highly detailed and breathtakingly expensive (to me) models that are coming out these days ... as others have mentioned, this seems a golden age.
Doug... you're a genius....
The theme for O Gauge Trains:
They're Fun to Run.
Celebrating 18 years on the CTT Forum.
Buckeye Riveter......... OTTS Charter Member, a Roseyville Raider and a member of the CTT Forum since 2004..
Jelloway Creek, OH - ELV 1,100 - Home of the Baltimore, Ohio & Wabash RR
TCA 09-64284
Viva, Las Vegas!
I too am a recovering former scale fidelist. Oh, the nights I spent scratchbuilding this, kitbashing that, superdetailing something else.
Now I'm just happy to get the right "look" on my layout, and watch the actors do their thing. Thank you Hawthorne Village, Dept 56, Lemax, and MTH Proto 2.0.
I can appreciate both ends of the spectrum when it comes to observing other's efforts, if not the fellowship it brings.
In my case, I just want to create a perfect world. That is not a mimic of the real thing, where everything is dirty, rusted and old and politics and lack of money have left their marks in the country. To me the trains are an "escape" where I just sit down and whatch then rolling. I enjoy the sounds, the backdrop always suggests a nice sunny day whith comfortable temperatures and trains are always factory new with shiny paintjobs.
Of course, weathering and superdetailling results in a very realistic and admirable scenery, but I miss the toytrain look on those layouts.
I love the 3 rail look and shiny paint jobs, so I'll have to live with that..
You might notice there has been a revival of actual Tinplate trains in both O and Standard Gauge. And Atlas O, for sure the current King of Scale, has just introduced it's very Toy like IR line.
There is no right or wrong way to set up a layout.. or play with your trains. You just pick your own space between accurate museum quality model and a loop of track on the floor.
trigtrax wrote: There is no right or wrong way to set up a layout.. or play with your trains. .........
There is no right or wrong way to set up a layout.. or play with your trains. .........
We have had this discussion before on this forum where it was argued, somewhat unsuccessfully, that you must run your trains clockwise around the loop. Interestingly there were newcomers to the forum that took the discussion seriously.
Buckeye Riveter wrote: trigtrax wrote: There is no right or wrong way to set up a layout.. or play with your trains. ......... We have had this discussion before on this forum where it was argued, somewhat unsuccessfully, that you must run your trains clockwise around the loop. Interestingly there were newcomers to the forum that took the discussion seriously.
Only those from Ohizo.
God bless TCA 05-58541 Benefactor Member of the NRA, Member of the American Legion, Retired Boss Hog of Roseyville , KC&D Qualified
Jon
So many roads, so little time.
Nothing is more fairly distributed than common sense: no one thinks he needs more of it than he already has.
Dougs world - Party time - Excellent
I confirm that anti-clockwise is the prefered direction here in the Southern Hemisphere. But is not this also the way that speedways & most horse racing is done, even in the Northern Hemisphere? Plus also running races (athletics)? Anti-clockwise is the way to go!!
Colin Duthie in New Zealand
Bob Nelson
Dave
It's a TOY, A child's PLAYTHING!!! (Woody from Toy Story)
Modeling the Baltimore waterfront in HO scale
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month