Trains.com

accessory wiring aboveboard

1129 views
17 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
accessory wiring aboveboard
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 10, 2005 5:22 PM
I am considering using skatch built power poles for suppling power to my accessories and on site lighting. Has anyone used this system,how did it work out,what problems did you run into,how about wire size and type etc.. I am in no hurry as I am at least a couple of months away from beginig this project. Any ideas are welcome. dr dan
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • 3,176 posts
Posted by csxt30 on Monday, October 10, 2005 6:39 PM
I never thought about doing that, but that sounds like a nice idea. The only thing I can think of would be using the right wire size. Hopefully some of the guys that know electronics will be along. Thanks for the idea & will be looking to see where I can do that , too !
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Bensalem, PA
  • 195 posts
Posted by Dave45681 on Monday, October 10, 2005 7:01 PM
Only problem that immediately comes to mind is that the wires would need to be too big if you feed any significant amount of power through any given leg.

I suppose it depends on your mindset of how to do this.

If you had a central area like a substation and fed your transformer into that and then ran only one accessory or small number of lights on each (smaller) wire you string from the telegraph poles, it might be do-able.

If you were thinking more like running some voltage through the wires to make a circuit around your layout and then tap off of that for everything, I suspect your wire size requirements would quickly make the electrical wires look like pipes.

-Dave

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 10, 2005 7:02 PM
wire size depends on how many items you want to use at one time and lengh of furthest item on your lay out. 18 or 20 awg will handel your voltage from your transformer. I just bought a roll of 18-2 awg from home depot and it was $40.00 for 500 ft roll. the only drawback is that you will need to strip it to seperate the white and red to get your single lines.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 10, 2005 8:31 PM
Get some #24 [or even smaller instrument control wires] and pursue the sub-station suggestion that Dave suggests. Then you can "homerun" wire feeds from the sub-station to the individual loads and avoid the relatively [to scale] huge transmission wire buss .
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 10,096 posts
Posted by lionelsoni on Monday, October 10, 2005 8:50 PM
The wire size has nothing to do with voltage and everything to do with current. Extrapolating rather far from building wire, 24 AWG should handle something like 2.5 amperes, 30 AWG 1 ampere, and 36 AWG 300 milliamperes. These are respectively 1, 1/2, and 1/4 O-scale inches in diameter, which doesn't seem too unreasonable. No insulation should be needed, just like the prototype, which will help to keep the diameter small.

I think the hardest part will be getting the wires to seem to hang realistically.

A problem with the substation is that it would be fed from a higher voltage transmission line with wire not much different from that in the distribution circuits. It might be best to cheat and feed it from underneath. Each distribution circuit should feed a fake pole-mounted transformers. There will generally be 4 wires on each pole, that is, 3 phases, typically at the top of the pole and on each end of a crossarm. The neutral will run underneath the crossarm. As the line nears its end, it may split into single-phase lines, with phase on top and neutral underneath--no crossarm. Each distribution transformer will be wired between a phase and the neutral.

Except in California, where the distribution transformer will be wired between two phases. Go figure.

Bob Nelson

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, October 11, 2005 5:59 AM
thanks agin bob i like your ideas, you should write a book i'buy it. as you said my biggest problem woud how it'll look hanging. i as thinking to use 24 or 26 bare wire then covering it with liquid insulation. was bare wiring used during the the fifties? thanx agin dr dan
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Delray Beach, FL
  • 311 posts
Posted by andregg1 on Tuesday, October 11, 2005 8:06 AM
I did
Is very nice, but.....when is time for clean your layout start the nightmare.
so I decline and go back to the traditional sistem under the plywood.
Andre.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 10,096 posts
Posted by lionelsoni on Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:27 AM
As far as I know, bare wire has always been used for aerial wiring, whether for power, telephone, telegraph, or railroad signaling.

Bob Nelson

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Southern Indiana
  • 432 posts
Posted by marxalot on Tuesday, October 11, 2005 12:11 PM
Telephone cables are insulated and usually numerous insulated "pairs" under a single outer jacket. Power cables above 600 volts are most often bare but there are covered power cables in the 15 kV area. Power cables less than 600 volt dropping to structures are insulated.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 10,096 posts
Posted by lionelsoni on Tuesday, October 11, 2005 1:07 PM
You're right. Modern telephone circuits are usually in cables, whether overhead or buried. Although overhead power cables are the exception, service-entrance drops are always insulated. "Aerial" is too general a term. I should have said "open-wire".

Bob Nelson

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • 1,774 posts
Posted by Dr. John on Tuesday, October 11, 2005 1:53 PM
Peter Riddle, who has authored several books on toy trains (published by Kalmbach) used overhead wiring on a small layout in his office. It looked good and worked well. I wish I could recall which of his books show it.

Any help from the CTT guys on this?
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • 3,176 posts
Posted by csxt30 on Tuesday, October 11, 2005 2:01 PM
Oh I remember him! I think he was from New Zealand, or Nova Scotia, and I had 1 of his books, too ! I'll look & see if I still have it, but I don't think I do. Thanks, John
  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: Colorado
  • 4,075 posts
Posted by fwright on Tuesday, October 11, 2005 2:35 PM
Magnet wire - used for winding motors - would seem to be about right. It's insulated - with a thin film of laquer, I think. This would avoid problems with inadvertent short circuits. Just scrape the insulation off where you want to make connections (I use fine sandpaper). I use it for feeder wires to the track in HO. Comes in various sizes from about 24 gauge to 30 gauge, all solid. I wouldn't use smaller than 24 gauge to run Lionel/K-Line/MTH accessories, though. As others have said, biggest problem would be getting it to hang right.

Fred Wright
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • 68 posts
Posted by CSX FAN on Tuesday, October 11, 2005 3:36 PM
Can you say Godzilla? I have a Catenary system going in and was constantly warned that it will end your board walking days, or expect lots of damage if you trip on one. I love my Cat system but it is alot of work.

Jamie
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 10,096 posts
Posted by lionelsoni on Tuesday, October 11, 2005 3:45 PM
Catenary or power lines, it would be a good to come up with a way to make a weak mechanical joint every so often, so that when Godzilla trips over it, only a short section comes down.

Bob Nelson

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Southern Indiana
  • 432 posts
Posted by marxalot on Tuesday, October 11, 2005 10:07 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by lionelsoni

Catenary or power lines, it would be a good to come up with a way to make a weak mechanical joint every so often, so that when Godzilla trips over it, only a short section comes down.


And this would be prototypical too! Which reminds me of another thread..... but there is a utility co. in Illinois that had a tornado come through and because one tower/pole went down miles and miles of line when down. Not good. So when they rebuilt they put in off-sets every so often but routing the pole lines in a U shape. It is sort of like an expansion loop on steam lines. Anyhow, when a tower goes down now it should only affect the lines to the offsets!.

Jim
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • 68 posts
Posted by CSX FAN on Wednesday, October 12, 2005 6:17 AM
I was more concerned that if Godzilla tripped and fell. What would be the damage.

I didn't let it get to me and built the Cat anyway. It just makes you think to have everything done before you string the wires. I'm still planting pole at this time but will restore the area before I string Cat.

I have an additional problem that the "Helping Hands" are impacted because the wire is directly over the tracks.

It's a lot of work but well worth it.

Jamie

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month