Trains.com

lionel fastrack

13262 views
40 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: New England
  • 6,241 posts
Posted by Jumijo on Tuesday, October 18, 2005 5:43 AM
Brian,

No offense was intended in my post toward you or any one else, and none was taken by any thing you wrote. My point was that FasTrack is getting a bad wrap over this noise issue, and I think it's from veterans of the hobby that are used to the old tubular. Take the two track systems, tubular and FasTrack and have a newcomer set them both up and use them. Which system do you think they are going to prefer? I think the new track system is a quantum leap over the old style tubular - in looks and performance. Yes, it is 3 times more expensive, and I wholeheartedly agree that it's too expensive for what it is. But I've noticed that to be true with just about everything in the O guage realm. Heck, even new Plasticville structure kits are close to $20.00 a piece now.

Again, no offense was meant to Brian or anyone else. And I apologize for any that was interpreted.

Jim

Modeling the Baltimore waterfront in HO scale

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Willoughby, Ohio
  • 5,231 posts
Posted by spankybird on Tuesday, October 18, 2005 8:31 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Houdy

It's not 1950 anymore.


Maybe too bad it's not. Gasoline was $0.25/gal, loaf of bread was $0.35 and postage was $0.04 and payphone (remember them) was a $0.05 [:D]

I am a person with a very active inner child. This is why my wife loves me so. Willoughby, Ohio - the home of the CP & E RR. OTTS Founder www.spankybird.shutterfly.com 

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Millersburg, Pa.
  • 7,607 posts
Posted by laz 57 on Tuesday, October 18, 2005 8:52 AM
I'm running fasttrack now with my MTH PS2 loco's and with all the sound coming from the engines I haven't noticed the noise.
laz57
  There's a race of men that don't fit in, A race that can't stay still; Robert Service. TCA 03-55991
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 10,096 posts
Posted by lionelsoni on Tuesday, October 18, 2005 10:02 AM
Tom, first-class postage was still three cents in 1950. I can remember being shocked by having to get used to using six-cent airmail stamps instead when my family moved to Alaska in 1956.

Bob Nelson

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Willoughby, Ohio
  • 5,231 posts
Posted by spankybird on Tuesday, October 18, 2005 10:43 AM
Bob - you got me. I was only 1 year old in 1950, but I do remember the rest, as prices pertty much stayed the same for years.

I am a person with a very active inner child. This is why my wife loves me so. Willoughby, Ohio - the home of the CP & E RR. OTTS Founder www.spankybird.shutterfly.com 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, October 18, 2005 10:34 PM
BTW, plugging in some values for items in the 1961 catalog into an inflation calculator has a 1961 operating submarine car that cost $8.95 in 1961 would cost $52.29 in 2002. 2002 catalog price for the car was $49.95. A section of Super O track in 1961 went for 35 cents. Adjusted for inflation that comes to $2.18 and wouldn't have any ballast. A ZW went for $39.95, that comes to $249.17 in 2005 (to be fair, the 1961 model could only do 180 watts sustained output and didn't have a bell button).

Sorry, but to me the good old days were more old than good.

Hey, who's up for a polio outbreak. I really miss those duck and cover exercises in grade school.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 19, 2005 12:17 PM
I agree fastrack is nice and sturdy on a carpet, but gee, you can still get three feet of gargraves flex with a black center rail and wood ties for less than five bucks!
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Southwest Georgia
  • 5,028 posts
Posted by dwiemer on Tuesday, October 25, 2005 3:19 PM
Well Folks,
Lots of information has been exchanged since I first posted this question. One thought that was emailed privately to me, it was suggested to use two-sided, foam tape to mount the fastrack to the layout. As for actually getting the layout started, still working on the plan. My wife and I went to Sears and purchased the entire Lemax village to put on the set.
Thanks for all the great information.
Dennis

TCA#09-63805

 

Charter BTTs.jpg

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: North Texas
  • 5,707 posts
Posted by wrmcclellan on Tuesday, October 25, 2005 10:26 PM
Dennis,

Good luck and let us know how your layout turns out!

Regards,
Roy

Regards, Roy

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 26, 2005 3:51 AM
Whats all this talk about Fastrack trains noise? That stuff is music to my ears!!!

And when my wife starts griping about her crisis du jour, I say add a few more cars, crank up the Railsound volume, and open the throttle!!!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 26, 2005 2:46 PM
There is a Fastrck to O guage transition piece available these days. Which opens up a varietry of additional curve radii for layouts.

It's a shame someone hasn't come you with a 10" long vertically tapered O guage to 027 tansition piece. That would allow for layouts to take advantage of the 27" curve if needed.

I've started my hobby with Fastrack and I like it so far. Right now I'm experimenting with layouts for a 4' X 8' with a 4' X 4' dog leg.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month