Trains.com

Hey Big Boy, I have a question of you?

1420 views
16 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Hey Big Boy, I have a question of you?
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, November 20, 2004 7:57 AM
On your new layout are you going to incorperate any ON-30 in it? I think it might make a great look to really show off this newer scale. What do you think? Bill
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Saturday, November 20, 2004 8:35 AM
Sorry Bill, no narrow gauge. The layout is strictly prototype, modeled after local railroads here in the Twin Cities area. I'm pretty sure that there was never any narrow gauge in the state of Minnesota. The only possible exceptions would be in northern Minnesota for logging or mining.

By the way, On30 isn't really "new", it is just gaining popularity. I believe it simply uses HO gauge track with the proportion of O scale. Now if I still lived in Colorado, things might be different.[;)]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, November 20, 2004 11:51 AM
Face it Big Boy, Your just afraid of dealing with just two rails. [:p] You are to attached to three rails but sooner or later you will have to leave your safty net and venture out ot the big world. [;)] I was just curious, i is a great scale though. Like you said, if you still liked colorado.[}:)]
Bill
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, November 20, 2004 2:36 PM
Hey, Big Boy..........Acccording to a book I have about Milwaukee Road narrow gauge lines it said that Minnesota passed a law stating that all common carrier railroads built in Minnesota had to be standard gauge. Odd-d
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Saturday, November 20, 2004 3:08 PM
Oh Bill, over the years, I've tried them all. I've done N, HO, 2 rail O, G, and even tried 1" and 1-1/2". I am however, permenantly committed to 3 rail O. If I didn't own so much stuff, I might go back to HO. Imagine what I could do with a 46' x 38' space in HO.

A few weeks ago I attended my first operating session in over 20 years. The layout was HO. It was a lot of fun, but man, that stuff seemed small. I love Kadee couplers, and they work great when you have the magnet mounted in the track, but if you need to uncouple on the mainline where there is no magnet it can be a pain.

With the oversized 3 rail couplers, most have that little tab. Just reach in with a finger, and pop, piece of cake.

Then there's 2 rail wiring, wyes, reverse loops, and even turnouts can be a real hassle. 3 rail, no fuss, no muss. Maybe that's another reason it is so great for kids.

Since I'm not really into steam, maybe that is why narrow gauge has never grabbed me. As for 2 rail, I can honestly say, been there done that. [:D]
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Saturday, November 20, 2004 3:25 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Odd-d

Hey, Big Boy..........Acccording to a book I have about Milwaukee Road narrow gauge lines it said that Minnesota passed a law stating that all common carrier railroads built in Minnesota had to be standard gauge. Odd-d


Interesting Bob, I had never heard that one. That law has to date back to the beginning of Minnesota statehood, and I'll bet it is still on the books, though there hasn't been much new track laid in the last 70 years.

If there ever was any narrow gauge in Minnesota, it would probably gotten around that law by not being a common carrier. Private logging or mining could still work. The thing is that Minnesota really doesn't have mountains, and that was where most narrow gauge operations existed.[:)]
  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Holland
  • 1,404 posts
Posted by daan on Saturday, November 20, 2004 4:59 PM
Back to 2 rail?? Who's advice is that... Now he can enjoy something which works, no matter if you have a cleaning pad in your hand or not, and then one would start 2 rail again? Man I enjoy the no hassle but drive way of live 3 rail provides me. It has the weight, the power and the relayability of the real railroads.. My N-setup has been untouched since 0 was in the house..
Daan. I'm Dutch, but only by country...
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, November 20, 2004 8:25 PM
I have to agree with you on the oversized couplers and larger flanged wheels, they just plain work. I have about a 50/50 mix of steam and early diesal, so i can run either. Well tommorrow i can finally sit down and work on the railroad, football and trains.YAY Bill
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, November 20, 2004 11:39 PM
Who is Big Boy???
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Sunday, November 21, 2004 6:34 AM
Hello H.Zimmer,

Just click on his name in the box on the left side of his last post. His background and the personal info he wrote into his profile will pop up. He posts on the MR Forum regularly and often provides good info, especially to Newbies getting started.

Hope this helps.

Cheers and High Greens!

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Sunday, November 21, 2004 10:30 AM
Thanks Antonio, and congratulations on that fifth star. I've been meaning to say that for the last couple of days.
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Monday, November 22, 2004 7:16 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Big_Boy_4005

Thanks Antonio, and congratulations on that fifth star. I've been meaning to say that for the last couple of days.


Thanks Amigo! I appreciate it. [swg][tup]

Just trying to do my part helping to keep things coooooool whenever I spot potential trolling.

Cheers and High Greens! [:)][:D][8D][;)][8)]

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Monday, November 22, 2004 8:08 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by AntonioFP45

QUOTE: Originally posted by Big_Boy_4005

Thanks Antonio, and congratulations on that fifth star. I've been meaning to say that for the last couple of days.


Thanks Amigo! I appreciate it. [swg][tup]

Just trying to do my part helping to keep things coooooool whenever I spot potential trolling.

Cheers and High Greens! [:)][:D][8D][;)][8)]


[:D][;)][:p]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, November 22, 2004 9:22 AM
Big Boy,
Thanks for posting your picture. I always wondered what you looked like.
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Monday, November 22, 2004 10:32 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Sandy Jorgenson

Big Boy,
Thanks for posting your picture. I always wondered what you looked like.


That's not me Sandy. I thought that was you. This is me!!![;)]

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Monday, November 22, 2004 11:04 AM
Wow!

Guess this wonderful hobby of ours can "have an effect on you!"

Nuff Said!

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Monday, November 22, 2004 11:09 AM
Yes Antonio, but at least I still have my sense of humor.[swg]

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month