Trains.com

Layout Height

2836 views
8 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2008
  • From: Charlotte NC
  • 314 posts
Layout Height
Posted by aflyer on Wednesday, January 16, 2013 9:32 PM

Hi all,

I am planning a new layout and want to hear from you about preferred layout height.  My current layout is a 5 X 10 table with a height of 35".  I can reach in comfortably to move a car or stand up a fallen tree or figure up to about 35"

I am considering making the new layout ay 42, can you tell me your experience??  The new layout will be U shaped about 12X12-16. Will this increas or decrease my accessibility?  Will it improve the looks, operation?

Any and all input is appreciated.

Thank you,

George

  • Member since
    November 2012
  • 169 posts
Posted by railhead53 on Wednesday, January 16, 2013 11:00 PM

Hi George,

I'm working on an around the wall type layout where the track height ranges from 48 1/2" to 57 1/2" from the floor.  I am fairly tall and it is my view that the closer the trains are to eye level the more realistic things appear.  I still look down on my trains for the most part, but there have to be some compromises as I want others to be able to see the trains as well.

Generally, the taller the layout is the less distance one can reach into it.  I have a sturdy stool in the train room to help me when needed to reach areas farthest from the outer edge of the layout. 

It's really a matter of personal preferences and what works best for you.  Hope this is of some help.  Bo  Smile

Visit my website Bo's Trains at http://www.bostrains.com

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 10,096 posts
Posted by lionelsoni on Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:32 AM

Two other considerations are the ease of working under the layout and the possibilities for furniture underneath.  I use 45 inches, which is high enough for bookcases, cabinets, and a desk and workbench each halfway under the layout.

Bob Nelson

  • Member since
    August 2008
  • From: Virginia
  • 544 posts
Posted by TRAINCAT on Thursday, January 17, 2013 10:54 AM

I like mine at 35 inches. Still room to sit upright under the tables to do wire fixes.

Roger

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 143 posts
Posted by LittleTommy on Thursday, January 17, 2013 3:43 PM

Well, I split the difference.  I perfer a layout at eye level, but at eyelevel for me (60 inches)  one has to make the layout narrow in order to reach derailments, and it is too high up for the grandkids to see.  So we "split the difference"  The layout is 40 inches of the ground at its lowest elevation BUT every one over the age of 6 MUST operate the layout from a castered swivel chair One is only allowed  to stand up to clear a derailment or to do maintance work. 

It also makes my "forced perspective" look more credible when the layout is at eye level.

It may not work for everyone, but it works for me, and it is lot easier to deal with a problem simply by standing up than to get at it by using a cutout or liftout to get at inaccessable areas.

Little Tommy

 

  • Member since
    November 2007
  • From: Cape Ann Taxachusetts
  • 3,780 posts
Posted by RockIsland52 on Thursday, January 17, 2013 3:50 PM

I notice that some of the guys with kids or grandkids submit photos of the kiddies and their layouts.  Many of the younger ones can watch the trains while standing while others are perched on chairs for a better view. 

Reach, increased under-the-table storage, ease of working under the table on wiring and such, and your primary audience.

You can make an argument in either direction, taller or shorter.

Jack

IF IT WON'T COME LOOSE BY TAPPING ON IT, DON'T TRY TO FORCE IT. USE A BIGGER HAMMER.

KRM
  • Member since
    January 2011
  • From: North Bluff above Marseilles IL
  • 6,506 posts
Posted by KRM on Thursday, January 17, 2013 6:59 PM

For me it depends on a few thing all stated before. First is how tall you are will change it . I like to be able to reach the things at any point so I tried out heights that I could reach with the width of the top I want to use. Not having to reach over more than 4' I ended up with 33"  height. The 2 year old grand child needs to be on a chair but the older ones see it at eye level. I like to get down with them and watch it at eye level as well. it is great there.

Joined 1-21-2011    TCA 13-68614

Kev, From The North Bluff Above Marseilles IL. Whistling

 

  • Member since
    August 2008
  • From: Charlotte NC
  • 314 posts
Posted by aflyer on Thursday, January 17, 2013 10:33 PM

Thanks to each of you who have responded with all the pro's and cons of various heights.

I am leaning towards going to about 42", that will be a little closer to eye level than mi current 35.  And also allow me some good storage underneath.

Bo thanks for sharing your website great layout with beautiful scenery.

George

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: South Carolina
  • 9,713 posts
Posted by rtraincollector on Saturday, January 19, 2013 12:24 AM

This is very interesting to me as I'm about to start building my own layout. But I'm leaning towards 32" - 35". I want to be able to get under it without to much problem but want it lower to the ground ( the lower to the ground the shorter that run away train has to fall Laugh )

I'm doing 8' wide by 12 to 16 feet long not sure yet. Yes I'm going to have to have a access panel to comer up in the center some where probably two of them lol. I'm thinking 72" , 63" and 54" radius loops.  

Life's hard, even harder if your stupid  John Wayne

http://rtssite.shutterfly.com/

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month