Trains.com

FasTrack Informaton Needed

890 views
4 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Yukon OK
  • 385 posts
FasTrack Informaton Needed
Posted by okiechoochoo on Saturday, August 28, 2004 11:08 PM
Seems as how FasTrack was not tested in the October CTT, I will have to ask for some information. As I have about as many older Lionel magnetraction locomotives and I do traction tired Williams locomotives units I need to know if magnetraction will work well on FasTrack compared to the standard Lionel track. Also, how good are the FasTrack switches, any one using them.

Thanks

All Lionel all the time.

Okiechoochoo

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Colchester, Vermont
  • 1,136 posts
Posted by Kooljock1 on Sunday, August 29, 2004 7:23 PM
Let's see if I can help. I took a Post War #2046 to a piece of new "O" gauge track, and lifted. The track lifted with the drivers briefly before falling off. I then did the same experiment with a section of FasTrack. Same deal. It seems to me that the "O" track is heavier, but the FasTrack has more plastic "dead weight" pulling down from the magnetized drivers when lifted, so it's a wash.

The nice thing is, the railhead has a flatter profile, which increases adhesion with both MagneTraction and Traction Tired locomotives.

Switches? I have a pair of MANUAL O-36 turnouts. They are s-m-o-o-t-h. The new automatics haven't hit the streets yet, but I do like the LED lanterns and the art deco controllers!

Jon [8D]
Now broadcasting world-wide at http://www.wkol.com Weekdays 5:00 AM-10:00AM!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, August 29, 2004 8:05 PM
I agree, Jon; those switch controllers are awesome! I am jazzed by them enough to seriously consider making a major switch to fastrack. Don't get me wrong, I'm a big fan already, but the 'future' of fastrack is making me take a longer, harder look at it.

Can anyone at CTT PLEASE explain WHY fastrack was not included in the track survey? It seems such a glaring omission to me.
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Sunday, August 29, 2004 9:20 PM
I too agree it should have been tested, and included in the article. I even mentioned that fact in my post in the topic about the current issue of CTT. As one of the most out spoken critics of the Fastrack system, I am very curious as to why it was left out, and what the results would have shown.

What is really crazy is that 3 rail O is the only type of train that has so many different styles of track as to warrant such a test. Why isn't track just track??? It almost seems like an ego thing with the manufacturers to see who can do it better. Personally, I wi***hey would stop.

For those of you who are in love with Fastrack, I say beware. The "devil" is in the detail!!You should not be seduced by it's "sexy" appearance.[}:)][V] I know I sound like some Bible thumping preacher on this, but I honestly believe that the product is more trouble than it's worth, and it will not gain enough market share to remain in production forever.

Here endith the surmon.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, August 31, 2004 7:51 PM
I use Fastrack including the 036 manual switches. NO PROBLEMS! I works as well or better than traditional 031 track and the looks are a huge improvement.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month