Trains.com

Do the Lionel Railbox Hi-Cube Boxcar Proportions Look Right to You???

2036 views
3 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Do the Lionel Railbox Hi-Cube Boxcar Proportions Look Right to You???
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, April 24, 2004 9:34 PM
I ordered a Lionel 6-36273 RailBox Hi-Cube Boxcar RBOX 15000 sight unseen. When being pulled by my Santa Fe Hudson Jr. and Tender it , to my eyes at least, seems to dwarf the engine. So much so I checked the length to see if if it was scale or traditionally sized as I thought it was supposed to be.

The length matches the 10-1/4" length of other box cars. The extra height seems to lend extra visual mass out of proportion to the actual increase. Again this is just to my eyes.

I was just wondering what other operators of traditional sized (O-27) trains feel about the proportions of this car.

Thanks,
Steve

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 523 posts
Posted by mpzpw3 on Saturday, April 24, 2004 11:27 PM
Don't know if this will help, but I have a BN high cube car from the Lionel MPC era. With traditional, or O-27 sized equipment, the high cube car does look huge! I believe the prototype for this car is also somewhat larger than the usual boxcar. However, for some reason, Lionel decided to make a lot of their diesel engines to a more scale proportion. 6464 style boxcars look too small behind these engines, to me at least. With a more scale-sized engine, a high cube right behind the engine, with a gondola behind that, makes a nice transition to the 6464 style cars. I like to run my MPC-era high cubes with my Williams SW-9, because they look better with the engine. In contrast, with a postwar or small steamer, the high cube looks terrible. A matter or preference I suppose.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, April 25, 2004 1:21 AM
Sorry...I just had to say that this...I like TOY trains and the oddness of this car is something to be admired. Enjoy!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, April 25, 2004 10:37 AM
Your right Jack it is a car to be admired, a pleasing car to own. I do like mpzpw3's technique of using other cars to create a visual transition to the HI-Cibe. I think I will start giving more attention to to the actual order arrangement of the cars I choose to run in any given string.

Whew it wasn't just me, guess I don't need new bi-focals after all. [swg]

Steve

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month