Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

How do suitcase connectors (insulation displacement connectors) work?

14718 views
61 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Sweden
  • 2,082 posts
How do suitcase connectors (insulation displacement connectors) work?
Posted by electrolove on Monday, August 8, 2005 4:04 AM
Can someone please explain how suitcase connectors (insulation displacement connectors) works? I have seen them on pictures (like the on below) but I can't figure it out.

Rio Grande Zephyr 5771 from Denver, Colorado to Salt Lake City, Utah "Thru the Rockies"
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Central Texas
  • 251 posts
Posted by novicerr on Monday, August 8, 2005 5:02 AM
You put the wires in the end. No need to strip the wires. You pu***he metal tab down with pliers. This cuts the insulation and makes contact with the wires. Then fold the tab over and it snaps in place. I have used them several times on things. Not on the layout yet, but should work great for connecting two wires.
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Sweden
  • 2,082 posts
Posted by electrolove on Monday, August 8, 2005 5:20 AM
Ok, so you don't need to strip the wires, cool. Can I use them as a bus wire like this? I think that is what Joe Fugate mean in the DCC clinic but I'm not sure.



Or maybe as bus power for tortoise switch machines?
Rio Grande Zephyr 5771 from Denver, Colorado to Salt Lake City, Utah "Thru the Rockies"
  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Christchurch New Zealand
  • 1,525 posts
Posted by NZRMac on Monday, August 8, 2005 5:33 AM
They are ideal for that.

Where do you get those cool diagrams from?

Ken.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, August 8, 2005 5:35 AM
I had a Jeep that I rewired with extra offroad lights, and rather than running separate wires to each light, I ran a single power wire bus and tapped off of it for each light, just like your second diagram Electrolove. Granted, that was DC, and I grounded the lights separately, but in principal, I think your idea should be fine for DC or DCC.
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Sweden
  • 2,082 posts
Posted by electrolove on Monday, August 8, 2005 5:44 AM
I did this in Photoshop. I used to work as a webdesigner and Photoshop teacher. I try to make little diagrams like this as often I can, just to make it clearer to everyone else that read the post. And it's a good way to explain things when I ask things as well. Always much easier to understand graphics then my crappy english. I'm from Sweden you know...

QUOTE: Originally posted by NZRMac

They are ideal for that.

Where do you get those cool diagrams from?

Ken.
Rio Grande Zephyr 5771 from Denver, Colorado to Salt Lake City, Utah "Thru the Rockies"
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Sweden
  • 2,082 posts
Posted by electrolove on Monday, August 8, 2005 5:47 AM
Cool, I learn new things every day, thanks.

QUOTE: Originally posted by jshrade

I had a Jeep that I rewired with extra offroad lights, and rather than running separate wires to each light, I ran a single power wire bus and tapped off of it for each light, just like your second diagram Electrolove. Granted, that was DC, and I grounded the lights separately, but in principal, I think your idea should be fine for DC or DCC.
Rio Grande Zephyr 5771 from Denver, Colorado to Salt Lake City, Utah "Thru the Rockies"
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Sweden
  • 2,082 posts
Posted by electrolove on Monday, August 8, 2005 5:59 AM
Btw:

This is another Photoshop trick that I use a lot. It's very handy sometimes. It's a fragment of the layout I'm building. The benchwork you see in the picture is about 30% of the whole benchwork.



Trackplan source: Model Railroader, 1987 November Issue, The Iron Wood RR by Larry R. Forgard
Rio Grande Zephyr 5771 from Denver, Colorado to Salt Lake City, Utah "Thru the Rockies"
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, August 8, 2005 6:28 AM
The brand name for those things is Scotch Lox. They've been used for years in the automotive industry. Say you want a add cruise on a car that didn't have it from the factory? That's how some of the wire connections are made since not all cars come with cruise harnesses. I don't really like them in long term applications. They leave the wire connection exposed to the elements. I guess if they stay indoors on a layout though, they might be ok. I'd still dab the ends with silicone though, just out of paranioa.

QUOTE: Originally posted by electrolove

Can someone please explain how suitcase connectors (insulation displacement connectors) works? I have seen them on pictures (like the on below) but I can't figure it out.


  • Member since
    April 2005
  • 20 posts
Posted by Derailedtoosoon on Monday, August 8, 2005 6:29 AM
Electrolove:
Now you’ve really peaked my curiosity. Is the picture a 1:1 print or did you merge your layout drawing on a photo of your bench work?

Roy
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Sweden
  • 2,082 posts
Posted by electrolove on Monday, August 8, 2005 6:42 AM
This is how it's done:

First I took a picture of my benchwork with my digital camera. Then I scanned the trackplan from an old number of model railroader. The trackplan is on a separate layer in Photoshop where I used the Distort tool to make the trackplan follow my benchwork. So I ended up with a 3d picture of the 2d trackplan, kind of. I also set the Opacity for the trackplan layer to around 40% so I can see the benchwork.

In fact, I planned my whole layout in Photoshop, benchwork, foam, track, inclines, scenery, electrical, backdrop, fascia. Everything on it's own layer so I can look at just the things I need for the moment. Nearly forgot to tell that I can measure everything with the Measure tool and translate it to the real world. So If I want to know the position of a turnout or a building, or the length of a track, or if my arms can reach everything, it's so easy. It's wonderful...

QUOTE: Originally posted by Derailedtoosoon

Electrolove:
Now you’ve really peaked my curiosity. Is the picture a 1:1 print or did you merge your layout drawing on a photo of your bench work?

Roy

Rio Grande Zephyr 5771 from Denver, Colorado to Salt Lake City, Utah "Thru the Rockies"
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Monday, August 8, 2005 8:38 AM
Electrolove, they work great, that's all I use on my layout.

The way they work is, you get the wires in place, then with a pair of pliers, squeeze them. The metal piece is is sharp and slotted. It pierces the insulation, and flares out around the wire. They should really be used with stranded wire, not solid.

You are supposed to only have to squeeze once, with that flap folded over the metal blade, but I've found it works better to do it in two steps. First get the blade all the way into the wire, then close the flap, which actually locks it in place.

You are probably going to want to use the red ones though. They are for smaller gauge wire. I use both sizes. I must say, these gizmos are a little expensive, but the good news is that they can be reused a couple of times, if you have the patience to salvage them.
  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Eastern Kentucky
  • 36 posts
Posted by dtbowyer on Monday, August 8, 2005 9:46 AM
Electrolove,

That's a neat trick with Photoshop. Wish I had the skills to do that.

BTW, my brother lived in Osthammer (I think that was the town's name) for a couple of years in the early nineties. (Taught music in the local school system and community.) I visited for a couple of weeks and we did the tourist thing. You have a beautiful country!

David
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, August 8, 2005 10:06 AM
This is most interesting...

Last April, when I was ready to string bus wires under part of my layout, somebody recommended that I use Scotch Locs instead of trying to solder my connections above head level (somewhat unsafe). OK, I thought, good idea!

So I went to my local hardware store and asked for them. The kid working there didn't know what I was talking about, so he called the manager, who said: "Oh yeah, I know what you mean" and he sold me some regular metal crimps that had the word 'lock' on the package label. Since I never read the "Electrical Wiring For Dummies" book I didn't know any better, so I bought them and used them. It took me ~4 weeks to do all the necessary stripping and cutting - NOW I find out I probably spent 3 weeks longer than necessary![:(!][banghead]

Arrrrrrrghh!!!



Well at least I'm not done yet, I guess I can still use these on the unfinished half of the layout...[sigh]
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Northeast Houston
  • 576 posts
Posted by mcouvillion on Monday, August 8, 2005 10:33 AM
Electrolove,

I used the Scotch Locs exclusively on the club layout and they are great. I used only the blue ones with a 14 AWG bus wire and 22 AWG feeders. (Several hundred!) You can buy them in bulk at electrical supply houses. Don't buy them at auto parts houses or Radio Shack - way too expensive. You can also re-use them if you need to. You'll figure out how to pull the wires out and reset the metal piece. I've found that small channel-lock pliers work better than regular pliers to set the metal crimp.

If you haven't started wiring the layout yet, I suggest you use a color code for the wiring. All left rail feeders are the same color as the left rail bus, a different color for the right rail. Makes it fast and foolproof to connect the wires. If you drop a wire from the turnout frogs, use a thrid color. Tony Koester uses green (as in frog). Good luck.

Mark C.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Portland, OR
  • 3,119 posts
Posted by jfugate on Monday, August 8, 2005 11:25 AM
Electro:

Have you seen Siskiyou Line vol 3 yet on electrical and control? I actually show how I install a suitcase connector on a power bus feed.

Picture is worth a 1000 words as they say.

The DCC clinic video from Seattle last year covers a lot of the concepts I actually demonstrate in vol 3. So if you want to see it done, vol 3's what you are looking for.

As has been said aleady, these things are easy to use. You just clip the suitcase connector over the bus wire, stick the feeder wire in the tap hole, and crimp with a heavy pair of pliers.

In my case, I use a 905 connector that is intended for 14 guage wire main and an 18 guage tap, but I use it over 12 guage wire main because I also want the 18 guage tap.

To get the connector work on 12 guage wire, I cut through just the insulation on the 12 guage wire first, then clip it on over the cut. Works like a charm on 12 guage wire this way, and I get the 18 guage tap that I want.

For some reason, 3M's 12 guage main suitcase connector only goes to a 22 guage tap as the largest size, which is too small for what I want. I prefer heavier feeders because some of my feeders run for several feet. Also, this heavier suitcase connector costs quite a bit more, so I also like the lighter 905's because they are cheaper.

Make sense?

Joe Fugate Modeling the 1980s SP Siskiyou Line in southern Oregon

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Sweden
  • 2,082 posts
Posted by electrolove on Monday, August 8, 2005 11:45 AM
Thanks Joe. Yes it makes sense, you are good at explaining things. The only thing I don't understand right now is what guage means. I asked that in another post. I'm trying to translate it to my Swedish world.
Rio Grande Zephyr 5771 from Denver, Colorado to Salt Lake City, Utah "Thru the Rockies"
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Portland, OR
  • 3,119 posts
Posted by jfugate on Monday, August 8, 2005 12:28 PM
Electro:

Wire guage, as you probably guessed, refers to the diameter of the wire. The smaller the number, the larger the wire.

From big to small ...
12 guage is the size of typical heavy wire used in house wiring (20A circuits)
14 guage is smaller than 12 guage and is used for lighter house wiring (15A circuits)
16 guage is sometimes called lamp wiring and is the size used in typical lightweight extension chords
18 guage is light wire sometimes called bell wire because it was first used in telephone wiring, and it's also commonly used to build ciruits in electrical classes in school
22 guage wire is often used in modern telephone wiring, and is a nice lightweight wire that's handy for carrying low voltages.

Hope that helps.

Joe Fugate Modeling the 1980s SP Siskiyou Line in southern Oregon

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Sweden
  • 2,082 posts
Posted by electrolove on Monday, August 8, 2005 12:30 PM
Joe, got it, thanks.
Rio Grande Zephyr 5771 from Denver, Colorado to Salt Lake City, Utah "Thru the Rockies"
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Monday, August 8, 2005 9:22 PM
While they may indeed work great, I just have this thing about trusting crimped-on anything. Even my bus lines - I put spade connectors on the ends to attach to a terminal strip. I crimp them with my crimper and then solder them. All my track drops to the bus are soldered - I have one of those automatic stripping tools, that clamps and strips the wire with one squeeze. It also is quite handy to strip back small sections of insulation - on the bus wire where I then wrap the bare end of the feeder around and solder. I offset the joints so the two bare spots are not adjancent to one another, but also go back and paint them with liquid electrical tape just to be doubly sure. Maybe overkill, but they also don't make taps for #12 to #20. I've been through the 3M web site. There's a #14 to #20, and a #12 to #18, but none suitable for 12 to 20.

--Randy

Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, August 8, 2005 9:56 PM
I have to agree with Randy, soldering is the prefered method for long term reliability. Suit cases are nice, quick and easy but not fool proof long term!
Will
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • 394 posts
Posted by ham99 on Monday, August 8, 2005 11:14 PM
I use suitcase connectors quite a bit. I have never had a connection fail. I also use the silicon-filled connectors that join three wires. They are used by the telephone company. They are made of red and clear plastic. Stick the three wires in three separate holes, squeeze, and you have a foolproof connection. I imagine they are a bit more expensive than Scotch Lox connectors. I'm not sure what they are called, since my telephone repairman neighbor gave me a bag of them. I think I paid 12 cents each for the suitcase connectors.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, August 9, 2005 12:27 AM
I think a properly done IDC, with the right wire and the right tools, will not fail. Might wvwn be better than solder, since you don't have the transition from rigid solder to flexible wire. Either way is plenty good, as long as it is done right. Crimps are a problem when they are hacked with improper tools (guilty).
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Sweden
  • 2,082 posts
Posted by electrolove on Tuesday, August 9, 2005 12:58 AM
Seems to be different opinions here. I really think every method is good, if you do it right. And maybe there is personal taste involved as well... [2c]
Rio Grande Zephyr 5771 from Denver, Colorado to Salt Lake City, Utah "Thru the Rockies"
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, August 9, 2005 1:06 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by electrolove

I really think every method is good, if you do it right.[2c]


That's the key...
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Ohio
  • 1,615 posts
Posted by Virginian on Tuesday, August 9, 2005 4:38 AM
Scotchloks, by 3M, are great, IF you use the right ones. The ones shown are not for exterior applications. They make ones for exterior applications with a semi liquid something in them to seal against the elements that are good even in a salt water atmosphere environment. As noted earlier, the interior ones shown leave the conductor exposed and can lead to corrosion. Should not be used on cars but every trailer hitch place in the world does it anyway because that's what the local Home Depot or Lowes stocks.
Use the right gauge ones too, otherwise you can have problems.
One last comment. These are NOT crimp on connectors (3M makes those too). The metal piece slides into place and is sprung to stay in place after it displaces the insulation. The 3M crimp on connectors will also last lifetimes IF you put them on with the 3M crimper that is made for them. Many eons ago, like 1968, AT&T, as in the old Ma Bell, used thousands of these things a week, and many are still in service, and I never heard of one failing that was was put on correctly (not with pliers), and they have been in continuous use ever since.
What could have happened.... did.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, August 9, 2005 6:04 AM
Right Electro. I think the ones you pictured will be just fine for the long haul. As long as your layout will be built and remain indoors, I really don't think you'll have a problem. If your layout is outside in a shop or outbuilding, I'd be more worried about moisture and corrosion. As I spoke of earlier, if it was me, I'd just dab silicone on the ends to seal it up. That way, you know you'll have a good connection for a LONG time.

QUOTE: Originally posted by electrolove

Seems to be different opinions here. I really think every method is good, if you do it right. And maybe there is personal taste involved as well... [2c]
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Finger Lakes
  • 10,198 posts
Posted by howmus on Tuesday, August 9, 2005 9:14 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by rrinker

While they may indeed work great, I just have this thing about trusting crimped-on anything. Even my bus lines - I put spade connectors on the ends to attach to a terminal strip. I crimp them with my crimper and then solder them. All my track drops to the bus are soldered
--Randy


I'm with Randy! I have had too many connections decide not to work over the years. I also prefer to use spade connectors and terminal strips and solder the connectors. Of course I find soldering very easy as I worked on an X Y frame for the Phone Company a couple of summers many, many years ago. I never have problems with open circuits. If those crimped on thingys get wiggled a few times you will have problems sooner or later. Just my [2c]

Ray Seneca Lake, Ontario, and Western R.R. (S.L.O.&W.) in HO

We'll get there sooner or later! 

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Holly, MI
  • 1,269 posts
Posted by ClinchValleySD40 on Tuesday, August 9, 2005 9:26 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by howmus

QUOTE: Originally posted by rrinker

While they may indeed work great, I just have this thing about trusting crimped-on anything. Even my bus lines - I put spade connectors on the ends to attach to a terminal strip. I crimp them with my crimper and then solder them. All my track drops to the bus are soldered
--Randy


I'm with Randy! I have had too many connections decide not to work over the years. I also prefer to use spade connectors and terminal strips and solder the connectors. Of course I find soldering very easy as I worked on an X Y frame for the Phone Company a couple of summers many, many years ago. I never have problems with open circuits. If those crimped on thingys get wiggled a few times you will have problems sooner or later. Just my [2c]


No way will they come loose (Scotchlok IDCs). If you've ever tried to remove one you'd see why. I have 100's of them on my layout (all drop feeders) and my layout runs smooth as silk. I could not imagine soldering all those drop feeders UNDER the layout.
I do use crimped spade connectors to connect bus wires to terminal strips at the booster locations.
No need for special tools for any of these. I use a plain pair of pliers to crimp the IDCs, works great. If you can snap the lid closed, it is crimped. For spade connectors, I use the crimper setting on the wire stripper.
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Finger Lakes
  • 10,198 posts
Posted by howmus on Tuesday, August 9, 2005 9:42 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by clinchvalley
No way will they come loose (Scotchlok IDCs). If you've ever tried to remove one you'd see why. I have 100's of them on my layout (all drop feeders) and my layout runs smooth as silk. I could not imagine soldering all those drop feeders UNDER the layout.
I do use crimped spade connectors to connect bus wires to terminal strips at the booster locations.
No need for special tools for any of these. I use a plain pair of pliers to crimp the IDCs, works great. If you can snap the lid closed, it is crimped. For spade connectors, I use the crimper setting on the wire stripper.


You may very well be right, but I still prefer a good solder joint to a crimped one. For spade lugs I also use the crimper on the wire stripper. I have found that if you wiggle the connection several times, about 1 in 4 will come loose. I don't solder under the table BTW. Spade lugs are put on the drop feeders before I run them up to the track (I value my eyes! LOL) This also saves time if and when you have to troubleshoot a short or change out track, etc.

But hey, Its your layout, do it what ever way works for you. I'm just one of those old f@%ts. [:D]

Ray Seneca Lake, Ontario, and Western R.R. (S.L.O.&W.) in HO

We'll get there sooner or later! 

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!