Trains.com

Modern And Old Freight Car Compatibility

4189 views
10 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: US
  • 971 posts
Modern And Old Freight Car Compatibility
Posted by alloboard on Thursday, July 15, 2010 11:52 PM

 I once thought that freight and passenger cars use the same wheel size until I found out that early freight cars used the smaller 33' wheel size. Then again I just discovered that modern freight cars use the universal 36' wheels along with their modern freight trucks. Then it means that a modern 60 ft freight car cannot couple onto the old 40 ft freight car because the coupler height won't be the same. However did railroad company upgrade the trucks and/or wheels of older freight cars or any conversion?

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Friday, July 16, 2010 12:14 AM

Coupler height has been standardized for a LONG time, and has nothing whatsoever to do with the size of the car wheels.  Mismatches of an inch or so in vertical height are more likely caused by spring compression of a heavily-laden car coupled to an empty (or a boxcar loaded with ping-pong balls.)

The biggest reason that you won't see modern cars coupled to 50s-era cars is that the 50s-era cars timed out at forty years and went to scrap before 2000.  It has nothing to do with coupler compatibility.

Chuck

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: NW Wisconsin
  • 3,857 posts
Posted by beaulieu on Friday, July 16, 2010 12:22 AM
Coupler height is indeed standardized, but wheel size is not. Car wheels vary from 28" to 38", with Tri-level Autoracks using the small ones, and 286k freight cars the big ones. Not only the wheels vary but so do the truck side frames. Autoracks are fairly light and the small wheels helps to lower the top of the car.
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,014 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Friday, July 16, 2010 3:18 AM

Differences in wheel size are accomodated by differences in the shapes of the transverse truck bolster, the mating car bolster, and the overall design of the car frame.

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,968 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Friday, July 16, 2010 9:03 AM
beaulieu
Coupler height is indeed standardized, but wheel size is not. Car wheels vary from 28" to 38", with Tri-level Autoracks using the small ones, and 286k freight cars the big ones. Not only the wheels vary but so do the truck side frames.
..and the roller bearing size, too.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,160 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Friday, July 16, 2010 9:56 AM

 

 

beaulieu
Coupler height is indeed standardized, but wheel size is not. Car wheels vary from 28" to 38", with Tri-level Autoracks using the small ones, and 286k freight cars the big ones. Not only the wheels vary but so do the truck side frames. Autoracks are fairly light and the small wheels helps to lower the top of the car.

   You might find this link of some interest:  http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1215/is_8_201/ai_64752052/

FTA:  "...One of the few things a supplier can do is improve coupler metallurgy, says McConway & Torley Director-Foundry Sales Scott Mautino, but there are limits. "We can improve the appearance of our castings, because better-looking, smoother castings have a longer life under load conditions. But the railroads are reluctant to pay for any of these improvements." One of McConway & Torley's newest products is its CX coupler pin, a more flexible C-10 pin that allows coupler parts to move without fatiguing the pin, one of the weakest point in the link..."

FTA: "...The biggest problem with couplers is "slop," or excessive slack action. MCSCM members standardized on a reduced-slack design just under two years ago that is starting to gain acceptance..."

And Lastly, I thought this was kind of an interesting point; FTA: "...Improving coupler knuckle service life is the next issue the MCSCM will tackle, says AEC-NACO's Becker. "If a coupler is going to fail, the knuckle is the part you want to have break first because it's the easiest to replace," he says. "But our customers don't want them breaking as frequently as they do now..."

(EDIT)And the referenced 40 year car rule is a reality:

Link to UP RR's policiy on this:  http://www.uprr.com/customers/equip-resources/overage.shtml

FTL:  Association of American Railroads Over Age Car Guidelines:

According to the Association of American Railroads (AAR), when cars are 40 years old, built prior to 1974, they are no longer allowed for "Free Interchange" service.  They may be handled between participating railroads on an exception basis or must go through a recertification program per AAR Rule 88 Rebuild or AAR Rule 88 Extended Service Status (reference the AAR Office Manual Rule 88 for the explanation of the requirements for the recertification programs).  The recertification must be approved by the AAR Equipment Engineering Committee.

Cars built from July 1974 to present or cars which have received an AAR Rule 88 Rebuild or AAR Rule 88 Extended Service Status may continue in interchange service to 50 years of age.  After these cars reach the 50 years of age they may be handled between participating railroads by agreement of all railroads concerned. 

 

 


 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Vicksburg, Michigan
  • 2,303 posts
Posted by Andrew Falconer on Monday, July 26, 2010 11:52 PM

The fourty-year-old freight car rule is only for cars that have not been upgraded with parts like  break appliances.

ACF, now ARI, officials have stated in TRAINS that a properly Maintained ACF Center Flow Covered Hopper should last 100 years if properly maintained. It did not come across as a joke in the article.

Andrew

Andrew

Watch my videos on-line at https://www.youtube.com/user/AndrewNeilFalconer

  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 5,133 posts
Posted by ericsp on Thursday, August 5, 2010 2:31 AM

Andrew Falconer

The fourty-year-old freight car rule is only for cars that have not been upgraded with parts like  break appliances.

ACF, now ARI, officials have stated in TRAINS that a properly Maintained ACF Center Flow Covered Hopper should last 100 years if properly maintained. It did not come across as a joke in the article.

Andrew

 

The AAR Rule 88 requires that cars built before July 1, 1974 be barred from interchange service the month it will become 40 year old unless they are rebuilt according to AAR Rule 88.C.1.c, are accepted as Extended Service Status Units (88.C.1.f), or Increased Life Status Units (88.C.1.g), All of these require approval by the AAR Equipment Engineering Committee, inspections, etc. It is not a manner or just replacing a standard list of parts.

"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,513 posts
Posted by zugmann on Thursday, August 5, 2010 8:39 AM

Andrew Falconer

The fourty-year-old freight car rule is only for cars that have not been upgraded with parts like  break appliances.

ACF, now ARI, officials have stated in TRAINS that a properly Maintained ACF Center Flow Covered Hopper should last 100 years if properly maintained. It did not come across as a joke in the article.

Andrew

 

(emphasis mine - zug)

 

Unfortunately, such a beast has never been seen,...

  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,968 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Thursday, August 5, 2010 9:02 AM
Andrew Falconer
ACF, now ARI, officials have stated in TRAINS that a properly Maintained ACF Center Flow Covered Hopper should last 100 years if properly maintained. It did not come across as a joke in the article.
I'd hazard a guess that it's because the car was designed with an infinite fatigue life. There in nothing in the car's structure that will render it unusable or unsafe for 100 years (or more).

The 40 year old rule is more about trying to keep the car fleet commercially viable and allowing upgrades to eventually take hold in the car fleet. It is generally not about safety.

Let's say the industry wanted to move to an improved freight car truck design someday to allow higher operating speeds. They'd do this thru the AAR and, after 40 years at the max., the whole fleet would be equipped.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 5,133 posts
Posted by ericsp on Friday, August 6, 2010 2:55 AM

ACF is still around. They just do not make cars anymore. They sold that business to ARI.

ACF's address is 101 Clark Street, St. Charles. MO. ARI's address is 100 Clark Street, St. Charles, MO. If the address system is the same there as it is here, they are across the street from each other. However, I cannot find anything about any current affiliations between the two on their websites. 

"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy